环境政策“减污降碳”协同治理效果研究——基于排污费征收视角  

The Effect of “Reducing Pollution and Carbon Emissions” in Environmental Policy:a Study Based on the Perspective of Pollution Fee Collection

作　　者：孙慧[1,2] 邓又一 SUN Hui;DENG Youyi(Xinjiang University,Urumqi,830046;Center for Innovation of Management Research of Xinjiang,Urumqi,830046)

机构地区：[1]新疆大学经济与管理学院 [2]新疆大学创新管理研究中心

出　　处：《中国经济问题》2022年第3期115-129,共15页China Economic Studies

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71963030);新疆高校科研计划项目(XJEDU2017T003);新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划项目(XJEDU2019SI002)。

摘　　要：本文基于“波特假说”“庇古税”等相关理论,利用2008—2017年中国30个省份的面板数据,运用空间杜宾模型考察了环境政策“减污降碳”的协同治理效果。研究表明,环境政策能够起到“减污降碳”协同治理效果并具有滞后性,但对大气污染物和二氧化碳的减排效果存在差异;环境政策能够通过“源头预防”“过程控制”和“末端治理”抑制大气污染物排放,但只能在“源头预防”和“过程控制”中抑制碳排放;当考虑环境政策与低碳政策的混合效果时,发现政策的协同作用并不能进一步减少污染物和二氧化碳排放,相反其加剧了碳排放。Based on the “Porter hypothesis”,“Pigou tax” and other related theories,this paper investigates the synergistic governance effects of environmental policies on “pollution reduction and carbon reduction” using a spatial Durbin model with panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2017.Studies have shown that the implementation of environmental policies can have a synergistic effect on “pollution and carbon reduction” and have a lagging effect,but there are differences in the degree of reduction of air pollutions and CO_(2).Environmental policy can reduce air pollutions emissions through “source prevention”,“process control” and “end-of-pipe treatment”,but for carbon dioxide emissions,it can only play a role in “source prevention” and “process control”.When considering the mixed effect of environmental policies and low-carbon policies,it is found that the synergistic effects of policies do not further reduce air pollutants and carbon dioxide emissions,but rather exacerbate carbon dioxide emissions.

关 键 词：环境政策 “减污降碳” 源头预防 过程控制 末端治理 

分 类 号：X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程]