论高校纪律处分与轻微刑事犯罪处罚的衔接——基于41所“双一流”建设高校纪律处分条例的分析  

Study on the Connection between University Disciplinary Action and Minor Criminal Punishment:Based on Analysis of Disciplinary Regulations of 41 "Double First-Class" Universities

作　　者：赵赫栋 ZHAO Hedong(School of Public Administration,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]中国地质大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《复旦教育论坛》2022年第3期44-51,共8页Fudan Education Forum

摘　　要：我国高校校规对于轻微刑事犯罪行为的纪律处分规定非常严苛且笼统,原则上遵循“犯罪即开除”的并罚标准。这种粗暴的“一刀切”规定不仅与依法治教的法治要求相悖,也面临着理论上支撑不足的困境和刑法积极主义变革的挑战。当前,我国高校对于轻微刑事犯罪行为的纪律处分亟待规范化,应修改“犯罪即开除”的绝对规定,以比例原则为基本遵循,在轻微刑事犯罪与高校纪律处分的并罚上依次审查罪行与刑事结果标准、重大不利影响标准以及教育效果标准,同时纳入对微罪扩张趋势的考量,并遵循“先刑罚后处分”的处理顺序,以达到对轻微刑事犯罪行为作出恰当合理的纪律处分之目的。China’s university regulations have strict and general disciplinary provisions for minor criminal offenses. In principle, students who commit crimes must be expelled from the university. Such absolute provisions are not only contrary to the rule of law, but also face the dilemma of insufficient theoretical support and the challenges of the reform of criminal law activism. At present, disciplinary punishment for minor criminal acts in colleges and universities in China urgently needs to be standardized, and the absolute stipulation of "dismissal for a crime" should be revised. Based on the principle of proportionality, in the combined punishment of minor criminal offences and university disciplinary sanctions, colleges should sequentially review crimes and criminal outcome standards, major adverse impact standards, and education effectiveness standards, take the trend of Micro-Crime expansion to consideration, and follow the processing order of "penalty first and then sanction" to achieve the purpose of appropriate and reasonable disciplinary sanctions for minor criminal acts.

关 键 词：轻微刑事犯罪 纪律处分 比例原则 高校校规 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] G649.2[政治法律—法学]