检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李珊珊 孟高旺[1] Li Shanshan;Meng Gaowang(School of Forgign Languages,Huaibei Normal University,Anhui Huaibei 235000,China)
机构地区:[1]淮北师范大学外国语学院,安徽淮北235000
出 处:《黑河学院学报》2022年第7期120-122,共3页Journal of Heihe University
基 金:安徽省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目“移动学习中借助外刊英文输入提高二语书面输出能力的可行性研究”(2019SK16);2020年安徽省质量工程项目“大学英语课程思政示范课程”(2020szsfkc0788);2020年淮北师范大学质量工程项目“大学英语课程思政示范课程”(2020xkcsz013)。
摘 要:通过实证实验比较三种不同的输入方式(视听同时、先视后听和先听后视)对二语篇章理解的影响。对比研究发现:总体上,对于二语篇章理解,视、听输入并行呈现的效果显著好于序列呈现;另外,低水平受试的视听同时呈现组显著好于两个序列呈现组,而高水平受试的同时呈现组与先视后听组都显著优于先听后视组。组间对比显示,随着受试二语水平的提高,篇章理解在三种输入方式下都得到了显著的提高。An empirical research was conducted to test the three effects of input modes,which include reading-while-listening,reading-before-listening,and listening-before-reading,on discourse comprehension.The following results is found from the comparative research:overall language comprehension under the parallel presentation of visual and aural input is significantly better than that under the serial presentation;the mode of reading-while-listening for low-level group is significantly better than the other two groups;the mode of reading-while-listening and reading-before-listening in the high-level group are significantly better than the group of hearing before hearing.The comparison between groups shows that with the improvement of the second language level of the subjects,text comprehension is significantly improved in all three input modes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49