秘密窃取被行政机关扣押的本人财物的性质认定——以尹某盗窃案为视角  

Identification of the Nature of Secretly Stealing One’s Own Property Seized by Administrative Organs:From the Perspective of Yin’s Theft

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:周飞雁 ZHOU Feiyan(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区:[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出  处:《宁波开放大学学报》2022年第2期84-89,共6页Journal of Ningbo Open University

摘  要:窃取被行政机关扣押的本人财物,并未侵犯盗窃罪的法益,行政机关并未遭受财产损失,行为人主观上不具有非法占有目的,不符合盗窃罪的犯罪构成。非法处置扣押的财产罪中的司法机关不宜类推解释为行政机关,否则,违背罪刑法定原则,尹某的行为不应认定为非法处置扣押的财产罪。从功能责任论、批判性法益概念角度出发,行政管理秩序遭受的损害并不值得发动刑罚保护,刑罚作为最后一道关卡,应当谦抑,尹某的行为属于行政违法行为,不构成犯罪。Stealing the property seized by the administrative organ does not infringe the legal interests of larceny,the administrative organ does not suffer property losses,and the perpetrator does not have the purpose of illegal possession subjectively,which is not in line with the criminal constitution of larceny.In the crime of illegal disposal of seized property,the judicial organ should not be interpreted as an administrative organ by analogy.In violation of the principle of legality of crime and punishment,Yin’s behavior should not be recognized as the crime of illegal disposal of seized property.From the perspective of functional responsibility theory and the concept of critical legal interests,the damage to the administrative order is not worthy of criminal protection.As the last checkpoint,criminal punishment should be strictly prevented.Yin’s behavior belongs to administrative illegal behavior and does not constitute a crime.

关 键 词:盗窃罪 非法处置扣押的财产罪 功能责任论 批判性法益概念 

分 类 号:D924[政治法律—刑法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象