检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周飞雁 ZHOU Feiyan(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《宁波开放大学学报》2022年第2期84-89,共6页Journal of Ningbo Open University
摘 要:窃取被行政机关扣押的本人财物,并未侵犯盗窃罪的法益,行政机关并未遭受财产损失,行为人主观上不具有非法占有目的,不符合盗窃罪的犯罪构成。非法处置扣押的财产罪中的司法机关不宜类推解释为行政机关,否则,违背罪刑法定原则,尹某的行为不应认定为非法处置扣押的财产罪。从功能责任论、批判性法益概念角度出发,行政管理秩序遭受的损害并不值得发动刑罚保护,刑罚作为最后一道关卡,应当谦抑,尹某的行为属于行政违法行为,不构成犯罪。Stealing the property seized by the administrative organ does not infringe the legal interests of larceny,the administrative organ does not suffer property losses,and the perpetrator does not have the purpose of illegal possession subjectively,which is not in line with the criminal constitution of larceny.In the crime of illegal disposal of seized property,the judicial organ should not be interpreted as an administrative organ by analogy.In violation of the principle of legality of crime and punishment,Yin’s behavior should not be recognized as the crime of illegal disposal of seized property.From the perspective of functional responsibility theory and the concept of critical legal interests,the damage to the administrative order is not worthy of criminal protection.As the last checkpoint,criminal punishment should be strictly prevented.Yin’s behavior belongs to administrative illegal behavior and does not constitute a crime.
关 键 词:盗窃罪 非法处置扣押的财产罪 功能责任论 批判性法益概念
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171