检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康小玲 邱金花[1] 陈枫[1] Kang Xiaoling;Qiu Jinhua;Chen Feng(The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou Fujian 350001,China)
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院,福建福州350001
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2022年第16期17-19,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨风险评估护理干预对上尿路结石腔内碎石术患者的影响。方法:选取2019年1月1日~2021年5月31日100例上尿路结石腔内碎石术患者随机分为对照组和观察组各50例,对照组实施上尿路结石腔内碎石术常规护理,观察组实施风险评估护理干预,比较两组护理效果。结果:观察组复苏后循环功能指标、肾功能指标、肺功能指标均优于对照组(P<0.01),尿源性脓毒血症发生率低于对照组(P<0.01),护理满意度高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:风险评估护理干预可改善上尿路结石腔内碎石术患者的循环功能、肺功能及肾功能指标,降低尿源性脓毒血症发生率,提高护理满意度。Objective:To explore the risk assessment nursing intervention in patients with urinary stones cavity lithotripsy.Methods:During January 1,2019 to May 31,2021,100 patients with upper urinary calculi cavity lithotripsy were seleced and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 50 cases each,the control group implemented upper urinary calculi cavity lithotripsy routine nursing care,the observation group implemented risk assessment nursing intervention,comparison was made between the two groups on nursing effect.Results:The cycle function,renal function and pulmonary function indexes were better in the observation group after recovery than those in the control group(P<0.01),The incidence of urogenic sepsis was lower in the observation group than that in the control group(P<0.01),and the nursing satisfaction was higher in the observation group than that in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion:Risk assessment,nursing intervention can improve the circulation function,pulmonary function and renal function indexes in patients with upper urinary calculi cavity lithotripsy,reduce the incidence of urogenic sepsis,and improve the nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30