新《民事证据规定》中电子数据的真实性审查判断研究--以微信聊天记录电子数据为视角  

Study on the Review and Judgment of Authenticity of Electronic Data in the New Civil Evidence Provisions--From the Perspective of Electronic Data of WeChat Chatting History

作　　者：李桂霞 庞宇培 Li Guixia;Pang Yupei(School of Law,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300000)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学法学院,天津300000

出　　处：《中阿科技论坛（中英文）》2022年第8期185-189,共5页China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum

基　　金：2020年度天津市研究生科研创新项目“民法典背景下民事证据收集制度的协调与完善”(2020YJSS198)。

摘　　要：作为常见的即时聊天通讯工具,微信上的聊天内容会以电子形式存储下来。根据新《民事证据规定》第十四条的内容,微信聊天记录属于电子数据范畴下“即时通讯”的典型证据,也是当前诉讼案件中被频繁提及和使用的即时通讯类电子证据。然而,受制于当前落后的技术水平以及相关观念,微信证据的采纳率并不理想。本文从持有正确的电子证据真实观谈起,结合新民事证据规定中关于电子证据真实性的文本解读,具体分析了当前司法实践中微信电子数据真实性审查常见的问题,以期解决微信聊天记录电子证据的相应困境,有效提高电子证据的采纳率。As a common instant messenger,the chatting history on WeChat is stored in electronic form.According to Article 14 of the new Civil Evidence Provisions,chatting history are typical evidence of“instant communication”under the category of electronic data,which are frequently mentioned and used in current litigation cases.However,due to the overall backwardness of the current technical level and the influence of related concepts,the adoption rate of WeChat evidence is far from satisfactory.Starting from holding the correct view of electronic evidence authenticity,the text aims to examine some common issues of electronic data authenticity review of WeChat in current judicial practice by combining the textual interpretation of electronic evidence authenticity in the new civil evidence provisions,in order to address the corresponding dilemma of electronic evidence of WeChat chatting history and effectively enhance the adoption rate of electronic evidence.

关 键 词：微信聊天记录 电子数据 民事证据规定 真实性审查 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]