检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余峰燕[1] 周祎晴 梁琪[2] 李温玉 Yu Fengyan;Zhou Yiqing;Liang Qi;Li Wenyu(College of Management and Economics,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;School of Economics,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China)
机构地区:[1]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072 [2]南开大学经济学院,天津300071
出 处:《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期385-397,共13页Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71872127);国家自然科学基金重大项目(71790594);国家自然科学基金重大专项项目(72141304).
摘 要:银行日渐重视环境风险对信贷决策的影响,但鲜有研究探讨银行绿色治理的信贷定价效应。利用2011—2020年商业银行10044笔微观信贷数据研究发现:银行绿色治理显著提高其信贷定价,说明银行绿色治理成本通过信贷渠道转嫁到实体经济;企业绿色创新不显著影响绿色银行信贷利率,而紧密的银企关系会显著削弱银行绿色治理的成本转嫁效应。文章为监管部门评估绿色金融政策效果、协同银企利益关系提供了理论基础和经验证据。The banks have incorporated environmental risks into the assessment of credit pricing,while few studies have explored the credit pricing effect of green governance in banks.Using 10044 microcredit data of major commercial banks in China from 2011 to 2020,we find that green governance significantly improves the credit pricing of banks,which indicates that the cost of green governance is transferred to the real economy through credit channels.Enterprise green innovation does not affect the credit interest rate of green bank,and the close bank-enterprise relationship significantly weakens the cost pass-through effect of green governance.This research provides theoretical basis and empirical evidence for regulators to evaluate the effect of green finance policies and coordinate the interest relationship between banks and enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30