检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张淑红 王瑞 Zhang Shuhong;Wang Rui(People's Procuratorate of Huanggu District in Shenyang,Shenyang Liaoning 110031,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳市皇姑区人民检察院,辽宁沈阳110031 [2]沈阳市皇姑区人民检察院综合业务部,辽宁沈阳110031
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2022年第4期49-55,共7页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:通过诉前磋商程序明晰检察权与行政权的界限,并依据相互尊重、求同存异的原则共同达成修复效果,促进检察监督与行政履职的有机结合。从行政公益诉讼磋商程序的界定、我国及辽宁地区现状、域外法律制度的启示与借鉴、磋商制度面临的困境、程序设想与建议等方面对行政公益诉讼磋商程序进行解读,有助于强化法律体制管理,优化结构体系,进而为行政公益诉讼诉前化解纠纷、保护公共利益提供制度保障。The boundary between procuratorial power and administrative power is clarified through the pre-litigation consultation procedure,and the restoration effect is jointly achieved based on the principles of mutual respect and seeking common ground while reserving differences,to promote the organic combination of procuratorial supervision and administrative duty performance.From the definition of administrative public interest litigation consultation procedures,the current situation in Liaoning and other areas of China,the inspiration and reference of foreign legal systems,the difficulties faced by the consultation system,procedural assumptions and suggestions,etc.,to interpret the consultation procedures in administrative public interest litigation will help strengthen the management of legal system and optimize the structural system,and then provide institutional guarantees for resolving disputes and protecting public interests before administrative public interest litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7