探讨骨质疏松治疗仪结合运动疗法对骨质疏松症患者治疗效果的影响  

To Explore the Effect of Osteoporosis Therapeutic Instrument Combined with Exercise Therapy on Patients with Osteoporosis

作　　者：莫楚仪 MO Chu-yi(Chencun hospital affiliated to Shunde hospital of Southern medical university,Foshan,Guangdong 528313)

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学顺德医院附属陈村医院,广东顺德528313

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2022年第12期32-36,共5页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘　　要：观察骨质疏松患者采取骨质疏松治疗仪结合运动疗法治疗的效果.方法:随机抽选本院2019年3月-2020年4月接收的50例骨质疏松症患者,按照系统抽样法分组,对照组(25例)采取钙剂与运动疗法,观察组(25例)展开骨质疏松治疗仪结合运动疗法治疗,对比2组治疗效果.结果:治疗总有效率方面,对照组是72.00%,观察组是96.00%,观察组更高,与对照组比较,差异明显(P<0.05);骨密度、疼痛评分,2组治疗前未见明显差异(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组均比对照组优,差异明显(P<0.05);β-CTX和P1 NP方面,2组治疗前未见明显差异(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组与对照组β-CTX未见显著差异(P>0.05);观察组P1 NP比对照组高,差异显著(P<0.05).通过对治疗前、治疗6个月患者的腰椎、股骨颈、ward三角等各项指标进行比较,随后观察其评分.观察组、对照组患者在治疗前差异不大.治疗6个月观察组患者腰椎评分为(0.83±0.06)分,对照组腰椎评分为(0.76±0.12)分.观察组股骨颈、Ward三角、骨钙素评分均优于对照组,差异为(0.21±0.04)分,(0.04±0.02)分、(1.58±0.01)分,二者差异较大.结论:骨质疏松症患者临床治疗期间,结合骨质疏松治疗仪与运动疗法有助于患者骨密度和骨质代谢改善,减轻疼痛,而且有助于治疗效果的提高,值得采纳、推广.To observe the effect of osteoporosis treatment instrument combined with exercise therapy in patients with osteoporosis.Methods:50 patients with osteoporosis were randomly selected from March 2021 to A-pril 2022.They were divided into groups according to the systematic sampling method.The control group(25 cases)was treated with calcium and exercise therapy,and the observation group(25 cases)was treated with osteoporosis therapeutic instrument combined with exercise therapy.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Re-sults:In terms of the total effective rate,the control group was 72.00%,the observation group was 96.00%,and the observation group was higher.Compared with the control group,the difference was significant(P<0.05);There was no significant difference in bone mineral density and pain score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05);After treatment,the observation group was better than the control group(P<0.05);-There was no significant difference in CTX and p1np between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05);After treatment,the observation group and the control group-There was no significant difference in CTX(P>0.05);P1 np in the ob-servation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The indexes of lumbar spine,femoral neck and ward triangle were compared before and 6 months after treatment,and then the scores were ob-served.There was little difference between the observation group and the control group before treatment.After 6 months of treatment,the lumbar score of the observation group was 0.830.06,and that of the control group was 0.760.12.The scores of femoral neck,ward triangle and osteocalcin in the observation group were better than those in the control group,with the differences of 0.210.04,0.040.02 and 1.580.01.Conclusion:during the clinical treatment of patients with osteoporosis,the combination of osteoporosis therapeutic instrument and exercise therapy can not only improve the bone mineral density and bone metabolism,reduce pain,but also impro

关 键 词：骨质疏松症 运动疗法 骨质疏松治疗仪 

分 类 号：R681[医药卫生—骨科学]