检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: Hong Kyung Zoon(School of Social Welfare,Sungkyunkwan University,Seoul 06978,Korea)
机构地区:[1]韩国成均馆大学社会福利系
出 处:《社会保障评论》2022年第3期124-134,F0002,共12页Chinese Social Security Review
摘 要:经历20世纪90年代末亚洲金融危机之后,以收入保障制度为核心的韩国社会保障政策获得了迅速发展。但随着产业结构和劳动力市场变化,一系列贫困新问题的产生,给韩国收入保障制度带来了新挑战。近年来,新冠疫情加剧了收入保障问题,韩国不得不直面收入保障体系改革的问题。在传统贫困问题与新贫困问题叠加的情况下,关于韩国收入保障体系的改革产生了诸多争论。本文总结了无条件基本收入替代传统收入保障制度的主要弊端,并在现有制度框架基础上,提出了“创新型的收入保障制度体系”;试图破解传统俾斯麦模式的社会保险制度在后工业社会所遭遇的困境,通过制度创新来建立全生命周期的收入保障体系。After the financial crisis in the late 1990s, South Korea’s public welfare, including the income security system, has made rapid achievements. However, with changes in the industrial structure and labor market, a range of new poverty problems has gradually emerged, posing new challenges to the development of South Korea’s income security system. In recent years, the Covid-19Pandemic has made this long-standing institutional predicament highly visible, pushing South Korea to face the issue of reforming the income security system. With the overlapping of traditional poverty and new poverty, there have been many debates on the reform of South Korea’s income security system. This paper summarized several drawbacks of replacing the traditional income security system with unconditional basic income. On the basis of the existing institutional framework, this study puts forward a system of "innovative income security", aiming at solving the problems encountered by the traditional Bismarck model of social insurance system in post-industrial society and establishing a lifecycle income security system.
分 类 号:D731.26[政治法律—政治学] F131.26[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.205.101