检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏地 WEI Di
出 处:《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期108-116,共9页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“坚持和发展新时代‘枫桥经验’研究”(21AZD083);司法部2020年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“我国现行法律域外适用的标准和程序研究”(20SFB4066)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:虽然《监察法》和《监察法实施条例》为留置的适用及协助执行提供了基本法律框架,但警察权协助执行监察留置还存在诸多问题,直接影响法律实施、制度衔接及人权保障。警察权协助执行监察留置的必然性,由留置措施的限制人身自由性质、警察权的专属性以及监察权与警察权之间的权力配置所决定。警察权协助执行监察留置须遵从监察权调动警察权的界限、行使警察权的种类界限、警察权自身的运行界限这三重界限。为防止协助执行留置措施中的权力任性滥用,需要从协助需求侧的监察权和协助供给侧的警察权两端,强化对权力的制约规范,更好发挥警察权协助执行监察留置的制度效能。Although the Supervision Law and its implementation regulations provide a basic legal framework for the application and assistance of supervisory detention, there are still quite a few problems especially in the police power’s assistance in the enforcement of supervisory detention, which directly affect the implementation of supervisory laws and regulations,connection of legal systems and protection of human rights. The inevitability of the police power to assist supervisory detention is determined by the nature of supervisory detention, the specificity of police power, and power allocation between supervisory power and police power. Police power in assisting supervisory detention must comply with triple boundaries, including supervisory power boundary of mobilizing police power,the type boundary of exercising police power,and the operation boundary of each kind of police power itself. In order to prevent the arbitrary abuse of power,it is necessary to strengthen the restriction of power from two sides of the supervisory power and the police power,so as to give better play to the system efficiency of police power’s assistance in the implementation of supervisory detention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15