机构地区:[1]韶关市第一人民医院泌尿外科,广东韶关521000
出 处:《海南医学》2022年第16期2173-2176,共4页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨基于加速康复外科(ERAS)理念的循证护理对肾结石手术患者的干预效果。方法选择2019年11月至2020年11月韶关市第一人民医院泌尿外科收治的206例肾结石手术患者为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为观察组和对照组各103例。对照组患者给予常规护理,观察组患者给予基于ERAS理念的护理干预,两组患者均连续接受护理干预一周。比较两组患者术后情况、术后12 h、24 h、36 h、48 h的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、护理一周后阿森斯失眠量表(AIS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)的评分及术后并发症发生情况。结果干预后,观察组患者的术后排气时间、下床时间、排便时间、住院时间分别为(13.19±2.24)h、(9.09±1.56)h、(18.08±2.30)h、(6.26±1.07)d,明显快(短)于对照组的(24.38±3.17)h、(16.05±2.11)h、(25.75±2.26)h、(7.80±1.32)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,观察组患者在术后12 h、24 h、36 h、48 h的VAS评分分别为(4.20±0.85)分、(3.82±0.41)分、(4.00±0.50)分、(4.14±0.23)分,明显低于对照组的(5.38±0.91)分、(4.64±0.58)分、(4.88±0.66)分、(5.05±0.37)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,观察组患者的AIS、PSQI评分分别为(6.37±1.13)分、(8.79±1.24)分,明显低于对照组的(9.12±1.20)分、(11.18±1.09)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,观察组患者的精神状态、心理功能、社交功能、家庭生活评分分别为(39.14±1.58)分、(35.02±1.57)分、(37.20±2.55)分、(39.36±2.31)分,明显高于对照组的(32.31±1.62)分、(29.15±1.63)分、(31.09±2.40)分、(32.01±2.14)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论基于ERAS理念的循证护理能明显改善肾结石手术患者的术后情况,降低患者的VAS评分、AIS和PSQI评分,提升患者术后生活质量,值得在肾结石手术的临床护理�Objective To explore the intervention effect of evidence-based nursing based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)on patients undergoing nephrolithotomy.Methods A total of 206 patients undergoing nephrolithotomy treated in Department of Urology,the First People's Hospital of Shaoguan from November 2019 to November 2020 were selected as the research objects.According to the random number table method,the patients were divided into an observation group and a control group,with 103 patients in each group.The patients in the control group were given routine nursing care,and patients in the observation group were given evidence-based nursing based on ERAS concept,both for one week.The postoperative conditions,Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)score at 12 h,24 h,36 h,and 48 h after the operation,changes in the Athens Insomnia Scale(AIS),Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI),Comprehensive Quality of Life Questionnaire(GQOLI-74),and incidence of postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.Results After intervention,the postoperative exhaust time,out-of-bed activity time,defecation time,and length of hospital stay of the observation group were(13.19±2.24)h,(9.09±1.56)h,(18.08±2.30)h,(6.26±1.07)d,which were significantly faster(shorter)than(24.38±3.17)h,(16.05±2.11)h,(25.75±2.26)h,(7.80±1.32)d of the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the VAS scores of patients in the observation group at 12 h,24 h,36 h,and 48 h after the operation were(4.20±0.85)points,(3.82±0.41)points,(4.00±0.50)points,(4.14±0.23)points,which were significantly lower than(5.38±0.91)points,(4.64±0.58)points,(4.88±0.66)points,(5.05±0.37)points in the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the AIS and PSQI scores of the observation group were(6.37±1.13)points and(8.79±1.24)points,which were significantly lower than(9.12±1.20)points and(11.18±1.09)points of the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the scores of mental state,psychological function,social function,and family life in the observation grou
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...