台湾地区都市更新中的容积奖励制度改革研究  

Research on the Reform of FAR Awards during Urban Renewal in Taiwan

作　　者：薛燕府 袁奇峰 李如如[1,2,3] XUE Yanfu;YUAN Qifeng;LI Ruru

机构地区：[1]亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室 [2]华南理工大学建筑学院 [3]美国北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校

出　　处：《南方建筑》2022年第8期100-106,共7页South Architecture

基　　金：国家社科基金重大资助项目(20&ZD107):《基于国土空间规划的土地发展权配置与转移政策工具研究》;国家自然科学基金资助(51878284):《基于创新网络演化视角的城市创新空间绩效评估与规划技术研究——以珠江三角洲创新型科技园区为例》;国家留学基金资助项目(202006150142):《国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目》。

摘　　要：城市更新是既有利益格局的再平衡,也是空间增值收益的再分配过程。在内地城市更新中,容积奖励等制度也逐渐成为政府实现公益性政策目标、推动城市更新的重要政策工具。然而,由于制度设计缺陷引发的一系列容积率奖励运作问题值得关注。对我国台湾地区的研究表明,通过刚性与弹性管控相结合、增强奖励标准的确定性、增强奖励制度管控的精细化程度等改革方式,可以在一定程度上弥补制度缺陷,实现容积奖励的真正目标。深圳城市更新中的容积奖励制度与改革前的台湾地区具有相似之处,通过探究台湾地区容积奖励制度改革的运作逻辑,以期对深圳等内地地区城市更新中的容积奖励制度改革提供经验。Local governments always consider urban renewal as a quite important means to deal with the decline of the old urban areas and capture the appreciation of shadow land rent.The main goal of urban renewal is essentially to rebalance the existing interest patterns and also redistribute the land value-added income.During urban renewal,the realization of the public welfare policy goal and promotion of the urban renewal is always a game between the local governments and developers.For the government,the public welfare policies cannot be too rigid,or the land value-added benefits may be reduced and developers may lack the impetus for urban renewal.Similarly,public welfare policies can be absent completely,or public benefits in the urban renewal might be seized completely.During this process,Floor Area Ratio(FAR)awards have become an important institutional tool for the local government to balance development impetus and public interests.The local governments can partially substitute the improvement of the development intensity for the public facilities requiring urgent improvement by using the FAR awards,thus improving the overall public welfare of urban renewal projects.However,in the applied practices of urban renewal in the Chinese mainland,there are still some disadvantages in the employed FAR awards system design since it has been explored for only 10 years or so.Hence,the FAR awards system failed to achieve the expected public welfare effect during the process of urban renewal.Instead,the development intensity of the renewal project has been improved significantly and the public interests are damaged seriously.Similar problems can be found in Taiwan,China.Since the government of Taiwan restricts the upper limit and the calculation standards of FAR awards too rigidly,it is difficult for the local governments to design incentive policies for local public interests,which need to be improved.At the same time,there are floating items in the calculation formula of the FAR awards,thus causing conflicts between the develo

关 键 词：容积奖励 都市更新 制度改革 台湾地区 

分 类 号：TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]