国际法的“不确定性”及其对国际法治的影响  

Indeterminacy of International Law and its Impact on Global Rule of Law

作　　者：陈一峰[1] Chen Yifeng

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2022年第4期1102-1119,共18页Peking University Law Journal

摘　　要：随着批判国际法学的兴起,国际法的不确定性问题对传统国际法治理论提出了根本性的挑战。结构不确定性、语言不确定性、学说不确定性构成了国际法不确定性的主要来源。理解和克服国际法的不确定性、重构国际法研究的学科边界和正当性,构成了过去二十多年国际法学研究的一条学术主线。国际法的不确定性已经深深地嵌入在当今的国际法学研究中,深刻地变革国际法学的研究范式,改造国际法学的理论视野和研究风格,重塑国际法的学术话语。国际法的形式主义传统正在衰落,主体间性不断凸显,论辩主义成为新的主流方法。中国国际法学界有必要超越形式主义国际法治理论,基于发展中国家的历史经验和政治想象来构建新的国际法治理论,并积极开展国际法的跨学科研究。With the rise of critical international legal studies,indeterminacy thesis had brought fundamental challenges to traditional theories of international rule of law.Structural indeterminacy,linguistic ambiguities and doctrinal uncertainties all contest the determinacy of international law.An important line of international legal scholarship during the past two decades has been to understand and overcome the indeterminacy of international law and to reconstitute the boundaries and legitimacy of international law as a discipline.Today the issue of indeterminacy is so deeply embedded in international legal studies that it is opening new research paradigm of international law,reshaping the intellectual landscape and academic style,and remaking the vocabularies of international law.With the demise of formalism and resurgence of intersubjectivity,international law is turning to the theory of argumentation.It is necessary for Chinese academia to move beyond the formalistic tradition search for a new theory of international rule of law based on the historical experiences and political imaginations of developing countries and actively engage in interdisciplinary studies of international law.

关 键 词：国际法治 不确定性 批判法学 形式主义 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]