刘宝楠《论语正义》对刘台拱《论语骈枝》之继承  

On the Relationship Between Liu Baonan’s Notes and Commentaries of the Analects and Liu Taigong’s Further Annotations of the Analects

作　　者：秦跃宇 张永俊 QING Yueyu;ZHANG Yongjun(School of Humanities,Huzhou College,Huzhou Zhejiang 313000;School of Chinese Literature,Ludong University,Yantai 264025,China)

机构地区：[1]湖州学院人文学院,浙江湖州313000 [2]鲁东大学文学院,山东烟台264025

出　　处：《湖州师范学院学报》2022年第7期66-71,共6页Journal of Huzhou University

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“清代扬州学派文献整理”(14JZD035)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：刘宝楠与刘台拱同为乾嘉时期扬州学派宝应刘氏家族家学的杰出代表。作为清代“论语学”研究集大成之作的刘宝楠《论语正义》,直接受到了其族叔刘台拱《论语骈枝》的影响。其中全文引用之处有3条,因出于体例与论证需要而略作调整者有10条。通过细致对比两者的义理辨析与考证内容,可见刘宝楠将《论语骈枝》探求经典本义的解读进一步细致化具体化,系统概括出了《论语骈枝》引而未发的观点,并且发展和利用《论语骈枝》的阐释为自己的观点提供材料支撑。Liu Baonan(1791-1855)and Liu Taigong(1751-1805)were both outstanding scholars of the Liu family school of Yangzhou school in the reigns of Qianlong and Jiaqing.Liu Baonan’s Notes and Commentaries of the Analects,the masterpiece of studying The Analects in the Qing Dynasty,is directly influenced by Liu Taigong’s Further Annotations of the Analects.There are 3 citations of full text annotations and 10 adjustments due to the needs of style and argumentation.Detailed comparative study indicates that Liu Baonan further specified the annotations of The Analects in Liu Taigong’sworks,systematically generalized the viewpoints implied by Liu Taigong,and supported his own viewpoints with the explanations in Liu Taigong’s works.

关 键 词：刘宝楠 《论语正义》 刘台拱 《论语骈枝》 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]