基于再生制动技术的高铁牵引供电系统节能降耗方案的研究  

Research on Energy-saving and Consumption-Reducing Scheme of High-speed Railway Traction Power Supply System Based on Regenerative Braking Technology

作　　者：朱天乐 潘祉鸥 刘俊楠 姚星宇 刘俊希 管铮 贾鹏 ZHU Tianle;PAN Zhiou;LIU Junnan;YAO Xingyu;LIU Junxi;GUAN Zheng;JIA Peng(Nanjing Institute of Technology,Nanjing 211112,China)

机构地区：[1]南京工程学院,江苏南京211112

出　　处：《电工技术》2022年第14期184-186,共3页Electric Engineering

基　　金：南京工程学院电力工程学院“一种功率分配及精准定位的智能交互充电桩设备研发”(编号TB202204036)。

摘　　要：根据高速动车组能将再生制动能量用于高速动车组牵引原理,假设在此过程中无能量损失,并考虑储能限制及利用率等因素,计算出所提出的车载储能方案在利用3个超级电容情况下能于3年内回本,最终收益为953万元,而牵引变电所储能方案在利用10个超级电容情况下能于4年内回本,最终收益为2219万元。最后从经济、储能容量利用率、技术、安全可靠方面比较两者,分析两种节能降耗方案的优劣性。According to the principle that high-speed EMUs can use regenerative braking energy for the traction of high-speed EMUs,assuming that there is no energy loss in the process,and considering factors such as energy storage limitations and utilization,it is calculated that with the on-board energy storage solutions proposed,the cost can be recovered within 3 years in the case of 3 super capacitors,and the final income is 9.53 million Yuan.The energy storage solution in the traction substation can recover the cost within 4 years when using 10 super capacitors,and the final income comes to 22.19 million Yuan.At the same time,the two in terms of economy,energy storage capacity utilization,technology,safety and reliability.Finally,the advantages and disadvantages of the two energy-saving and consumption reduction schemes are analyzed by comparing the two from the aspects of economy,energy storage capacity utilization,technology,safety and reliability.

关 键 词：节能降耗 车载储能 牵引变电所储能 再生制动技术 

分 类 号：U223[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]