备战巴黎奥运周期国乒混双项目主要竞争对手伊藤美诚技战术打法研究——以东京奥运会混双决赛为例  

Research on the Technical and Tactical Features of ITO Mima,the Main Competitor of Chinese Table Tennis Mixed Doubles Event in the Paris Olympic Cycle——A Case Study on the Mixed Doubles Final of Tokyo Olympics

作　　者：王一凡 周娴 Wang Yifan;Zhou Xian(Sports Department,School of Humanities,Central Academy of Fine Arts,Beijing 100081,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]中央美术学院人文学院体育部,北京100081 [2]南京大学体育部,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《体育科技文献通报》2022年第8期23-27,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology

摘　　要：为深入了解国家乒乓球队混双项目中主要竞争对手技战术打法特点,协助国家乒乓球队在备战巴黎奥运周期中开展针对性的训练和比赛,本研究运用文献资料、录像观察、数理统计以及双打八轮次三段指标评估等方法对奥运混双冠军水谷隼/伊藤美诚技术优劣进行分析,总结运用技战术破解方法。结论:水谷隼/伊藤美诚在发抢段优势明显,整场比赛二人在发球环节表现优秀,伊藤美诚勾手发球落点、旋转多变,水谷隼在第三板抢攻质量高命中率稳定。伊藤美诚第三板被拧/拉反手位失分较多;水谷隼/伊藤美诚在接抢段表现一般,水谷隼在第四板表现具有明显优势,第二板接发球威胁性不高。伊藤美诚接发球多用反手接发,侧劈具有一定威胁,第四板失分较多;水谷隼/伊藤美诚在相持阶段表现不佳,水谷隼在相持多以中远台,侧身位失分较多。伊藤美诚在相持中反手位在处理旋转强的回球失分较多,伊藤美诚侧身高点拍打具有一定威胁。应对建议:中国选手在发抢段发球环节要加强旋转及落点变化,在转不转发球的基础上加入侧旋以及逆旋转发球的比例,落点在短球为主的基础上加大急长球以及正手为小三脚的比例,避免伊藤美诚使用侧劈技术。中国选手在第三板抢攻要加强对旋转的控制,加强针对伊藤美诚反手位;中国选手在接抢段第二板要加大使用拧拉比例,加强针对伊藤美诚反手位。第四板抢攻落点尽可能在正手位以及反手位大角度,避免伊藤美诚近台快打快弹;中国选手在相持阶段要加强落点控制尽可能打出重复落点,加强拉球旋转并注意伊藤美诚近台快攻以及侧身位高点拍打。In order to gain an in-depth understanding of the technical and tactical characteristics of the main competitors of Chinese table tennis mixed doubles event, and to assist the national table tennis team in carrying out targeted training and competitions in the preparations for the Paris Olympics, this research uses the methods of literature, video observation, mathematical statistics and eight doubles rounds to analyze the technical advantages and disadvantages of the Olympic mixed doubles champion Mizutani/Ito Mima, and summarize the use of technical and tactical solutions. Conclusion: Mizutani Hayabusa/Ito Mima has obvious advantages in the rushing stage. The two performed well in the serving link throughout the game. Ito Mima hooked the serve and the rotation was variable. Mizutani Hayabusa made a high-quality attack on the third board rate is stable. Ito Mima was screwed/pulled backhand on the third board and lost more points;Mizutani/Ito Mima performed averagely in the catch section, Mizutani has a clear advantage in the fourth board, and the second board is less threatening to serve. Mima Ito mostly uses backhand to receive serve, and the side split is a certain threat, and loses more points in the fourth board;Mizutani/Ito Mima did not perform well in the stalemate stage. more. In the stalemate, Mima Ito was in the backhand position to deal with the return ball with strong spin and lost more points. Mima Ito’s sideways slapping is a certain threat. Based on the above research conclusions, this paper summarizes the countermeasures and suggestions: Chinese players should strengthen the change of rotation and landing point in the stage of serving and grabbing, and add the proportion of side spin and reverse rotation on the basis of turning and not forwarding the ball, and the landing point should be mainly on the short ball. On the basis of increasing the proportion of sharp long balls and small three-legged forehands, it is necessary to avoid Ito Mima using the side split technique. Chinese players should

关 键 词：备战 巴黎奥运周期 八轮次三段法 乒乓球 混双技战术 

分 类 号：G846[文化科学—体育训练]