电信网络诈骗犯罪中帮助取款人的刑事责任分析  

Analysis of the Criminal Responsibility of the Helper in the Crime of Telecom Network Fraud

作　　者：黄璇 HUANG Xuan(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《皖西学院学报》2022年第4期79-83,130,共6页Journal of West Anhui University

摘　　要：电信网络诈骗犯罪日益猖獗且形成了以诈骗犯罪为中心的黑灰产业链。对于帮助实施电信诈骗的犯罪分子取款的人员是否成立诈骗罪共犯,实务中存在“同案异判”现象突出、判决说理不够明确充分的问题。对此,应当着眼于传统刑法理论中共犯处罚的基本原理、诈骗罪的基本构造,对相关法律规范的内涵作出准确理解。行为人之间有无事前通谋,是司法机关对取款人区分适用诈骗罪共同犯罪和掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益罪的要点之一,具体案件中应综合各类涉案因素进行判断。取款人在诈骗罪既遂前参与犯罪的,也可认定为共犯,同时,办案人员应采“失控说”的标准对诈骗罪是否既遂进行判断。At present,telecom network fraud crimes are becoming more and more rampant and an industry chain centered on fraud crimes has been formed.Regarding whether persons who help criminals withdraw money are accomplices in fraud crimes,there are problems in practice,such as the situations of“different judgments in similar cases”,and the reasoning of the judgment is not clear and sufficient.In this regard,attention should be focused on the basic principles of accomplice punishment and the basic structure of the crime of fraud,and make an accurate understanding of the connotation of relevant laws and regulations.The presence or absence of prior conspiracy between the actors is one of the main points for the judiciary to distinguish between the accomplices of fraud crimes and the crimes of concealing and concealing the proceeds of crimes.It should be judged based on various factors involved in specific cases.If the person who help to withdraw the money participates in the crime before the crime of fraud is completed,it could also be an accomplice.At the same time,the person handling the case should use the standard of“theory of out of control”to make a judgment on whether the crime of fraud is completed.

关 键 词：电信网络诈骗 帮助取款 共犯认定 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]