复合行为犯理论检视及其问题研究  

Research on Compound Behavior Viewingand Relative Question

作　　者：赵运锋 Zhao Yunfeng(School of Criminal Justice,Shanghai University of Political science and Law,Shanghai 201701)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院刑事司法学院,上海201701

出　　处：《政法论丛》2022年第4期119-129,共11页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：最高人民检察院理论研究课题“企业附条件不起诉立法研究”(GJ2021D12);司法部法治建设与法学理论研究科研项目“犯罪构造中程序性要素立法问题研究”(20SFB4027)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：复合行为犯和单一行为犯是刑法理论上的两种犯罪类型。应从三个维度分析复合行为犯的行为结构,分别为认知规范性、法益侵害性和逻辑独立性。在传统刑法理论上,由于复合行为犯内涵界定过宽,导致复合行为认定在三个层面上出现偏差:一是将具有偏正关系的构成要件行为认定为复合行为;二是认为短缩的二行为犯是单一行为犯;三是将程序性规定视为复合行为要素。对复合行为犯中的疑难问题应作法理分析,主要需对个罪行为中的聚众行为、目的行为、不作为行为等类型进行合理解读和诠释。Compound act crime and single act crime are two types of crime in criminal law theory.The behavior structure of compound behavior crime should be analyzed from three dimensions:cognitive normalization,infringement of legal interests and logical independence.In the traditional criminal law theory,due to the wide definition of the connotation of compound act crime,there are deviations in the identification of compound act at three levels:first,identify the constitutive element act with positive relationship as compound act;The second is that the shortened crime is a single crime;The third is to regard procedural provisions as elements of compound behavior.We should make a doctrinal analysis of the compound act crime and construct the identification rules of the compound act,mainly including thecrowd behavior、Purposeful behavior、Omission behavior.

关 键 词：复合行为 主观超过要素 客观处罚条件 偏正结构 

分 类 号：DF639[政治法律—刑法学]