检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭苇琪 隋鑫[1] GUO Weiqi;SUI Xin(College of Social History,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou,Fujan 350117)
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学社会历史学院,福建福州350117
出 处:《档案学刊》2022年第1期58-64,75,共8页Academic Journal of Archives
摘 要:社交媒体平台已成为疫情常态化下公众信息交流的主要阵地,中美两国记忆机构皆采取了疫情社交媒体信息存档行动。通过网络调研,从存档主体、存档客体、存档方法、存档结果四个方面对中美两国存档行动进行解构对比,发现我国社交媒体信息存档现具有主体单一、来源狭窄、方法局限、成果模糊等问题,整体发展进程较为缓慢,在此基础上提出了档案部门转换思路适应存档需求、加快推进法规建设创新技术帮扶模式、积极开展社会化合作拓宽信息来源、多样化开发利用延长成果效益链这四点启示性措施。Social media platforms have become the main forum for public information exchange underthe normalization of epidemics and memory institutions in both China and the United States have taken actions to archive social media information on epidemics.Through online research,we deconstructed and compared the archiving actions in China and the United States in four directions:archiving subjects,archiving objects,archiving methods,and archiving results,and found that Chinas social media information archiving now has single subjects,narrow sources,limited methods,and ambiguous resuls,and the overaldevelopment process is slow.On the basis of this,we propose four inspirational measures:changing the mindset of archiving departments to adapt to archiving needs,accel erating the innovation of archiving technology actively carryingout social cooperation to broaden information sources,and exending the benefit chain of results through diversified development and utilization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222