检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:骆亚南[1] Luo Ya'nan(YongZhou Vocational Technical College,Hunan Province,Yongzhou 425100,China)
出 处:《成才之路》2022年第27期63-66,共4页Way of Success
基 金:2020年湖南省职业教育教学改革研究项目“工作过程系统化视域下高职《护理基本技术》实训教学改革研究”(编号:ZJGB2020045)研究成果。
摘 要:目的:观察不同授课模式下高职院校"护理基本技术实训教学效果。方法:选择2020届60名护理专业学生作为研究样本,对30名学生采用传统授课形式(对照组),以工作过程系统化理论为基础对其他30名学生进行教学(实验组),测评各组学生成绩、评判性思维能力。结果:实验组学生理论知识、实践技能评分均高于对照组,组间数据差异明显,均有统计学意义;实验组学生推导、假定等能力评分高于对照组。实验组和对照组对教学模式的支持率分别为96.7%、73.3%,数据差异显著。Objective: to observe the practical teaching effect of "basic nursing skills" in higher vocational colleges under different teaching modes. Methods: 60 nursing students in 2020 were selected as the research samples, 30 students were taught in the traditional teaching form(control group), and the other 30 students were taught on the basis of the systematic theory of work process(experimental group), and the students’ grades and critical thinking ability in each group were evaluated. Results: the scores of students’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and there were significant differences between the groups;students in the experimental group scored higher in derivation,assumption and other abilities than those in the control group. The support rates of the experimental group and the control group for the teaching mode were 96.7% and 73.3% respectively, and the data difference was significant.
关 键 词:护理专业 “护理基本技术” 工作过程系统化理论 实训教学
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.226.170