检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张正平[1] 杨辉 刘达 赵赫 王瑞国 陈彦飞[1] 钱冰[4] 曹心浩 杨俊松[1] 许正伟[1] 刘团江[1] 孙宏慧 郝定均[1] 赵勤鹏[4] Zhang Zhengping;Yang Hui;Liu Da;Zhao He;Wang Ruiguo;Chen Yanfei;Qian Bing;Cao Xinhao;Yang Junsong;Xu Zhengwei;Liu Tuanjiang;Sun Honghui;Hao Dingjun;Zhao Qinpeng(Department of Spine Surgery,Honghui Hospital,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710054,China;Department of Orthopedic Surgery,Huyi District People's Hospital,Xi'an 710300,China;The General Hospital of Western Theater Command,Chengdu 610083,China;Department of Emergency,Honghui Hospital,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710054,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学附属红会医院脊柱病医院,西安710054 [2]西安市邑区人民医院骨科,西安710300 [3]西部战区总医院,成都610083 [4]西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院急诊科,西安710054
出 处:《中华创伤骨科杂志》2022年第7期558-564,共7页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基 金:陕西省重点研发计划(2021SF-238);西安市卫健委面上项目(2021ms06);西安市英才计划领军创新人才项目(XARC210135)。
摘 要:目的探讨屈曲侧弯旋转复位联合一期前路手术治疗下颈椎脱位合并单侧小关节绞锁的疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年11月至2018年10月西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院脊柱病医院收治的32例单侧下颈椎骨折脱位患者资料。根据治疗方法不同分为2组:急诊组(采用前路屈曲侧弯旋转复位联合一期前路手术治疗)16例,男13例,女3例;年龄24~63岁。牵引组(采用头颅牵引复位联合二期前路手术治疗)16例,男12例,女4例;年龄20~64岁。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、植骨融合率、美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级改善情况、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分。结果两组患者术前一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05),具有可比性。所有患者随访26~40个月。急诊组住院时间为(7.2±1.2)d,较牵引组(10.9±1.2)d短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的手术时间、出血量,以及术后24个月ASIA分级改善情况、JOA评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),所有患者椎间隙均骨性融合。结论一期前路屈曲侧弯旋转复位手术与传统方法相比在神经功能恢复方面无明显区别,但住院时间更短。Objective To investigate the efficacy of flexion-lateral curvature-supination reduction combined with primary anterior surgery for the treatment of lower cervical dislocation with unilateral facet inter-locking.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in the 32 patients who had been admitted to Department of Spine Surgery,Honghui Hospital for lower cervical dislocation with unilateral facet interlocking from November 2015 to October 2018.According to their treatments,they were divided into 2 groups.In the emergency group treated by flexion-lateral curvature-supination reduction combined with primary anterior surgery,there were 13 males and 3 females,aged from 24 to 63 years.In the traction group treated by cranial traction reduction combined with secondary anterior surgery,there were 12 males and 4 females,aged from 20 to 64 years.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,bone graft fusion,American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA)grade and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score were compared between the 2 groups.Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups,showing they were comparable(P<0.05).All patients were followed up from 26 to 40 months.The hospital stay for the emergency group[(7.2±1.2)d]was significantly shorter than that for the traction group[(10.9±1.2)d](P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the operation time,blood loss,ASIA grade or JOA score between the 2 groups(P>0.05).All patients achieved osseous fusion of intervertebral space.Conclusion Compared with traditional methods,flexion-lateral curvature-supination reduction combined with primay anterior surgery shows no significant difference in the recovery of neurological function but leads to a shorter hospital stay.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.21