行贿和受贿决策框架效应的分离  

The Dissociative Framing Effect on Bribe-offering and Bribe-taking Decision

作　　者：张航[1] 句馨 牛冰钰 田慧溢 程晓荣[1] 范炤[1] 定险峰[1] ZHANG Hang;JU Xin;NIU Bing-yu;TIAN Hui-yi;CHENG Xiao-rong;FAN Zhao;DING Xian-feng(School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2022年第4期973-978,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目资助(19BSH119)。

摘　　要：目的:本研究主要探讨行贿决策和受贿决策中框架效应的分离及内在心理机制。方法:实验1分别探讨受贿决策和行贿决策的框架效应;实验2采用有工作经验的被试以增加生态效度,进一步验证框架效应在行贿决策和受贿决策上的分离;实验3考察道德和法律惩罚在行贿和受贿的框架效应分离中的作用。结果:实验1发现,行贿决策和受贿决策在框架效应上出现了分离。实验2进一步验证了实验1,且发现框架效应受到风险调节,风险较高时,分离效应减弱。实验3发现,道德在行贿决策和受贿决策的框架效应分离中起部分中介作用。结论:行贿和受贿决策存在框架效应分离,道德仅对受贿决策有影响。Objective:The present study aimed to explore the dissociative framing effect and psychological mechanism of bribe-offering and bribe-taking decision.Methods:Study 1 explored the framing effects of bribe-offering and bribetaking decision;Based on Study 1,Study 2 verified the dissociative framing effect in participants with working experiences to improve the ecological validity.Study 3 further examined whether morality and legal punishment played the multiple mediating effect on corruption decision-making.Results:Study 1 found the dissociative effects of bribe-offering and bribetaking decision.In Study 2,the framing effect was mediated by risk and eliminated with higher risk.In Study 3,morality played partial mediating role in the dissociative framing effect of bribe-offering and bribe-taking decision.Conclusion:The dissociative framing effect differs in bribe-offering and bribe-taking decision,while morality only works in the latter.

关 键 词：行贿 受贿 框架效应 道德 法律惩罚 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]