检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张博实 Zhang Boshi
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学文学院
出 处:《中国比较文学》2022年第2期118-133,共16页Comparative Literature in China
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“社会主义文学经验和改革开放时代的中国文学研究”(编号:19ZDA277)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文主要以马尔克斯与阎连科的作品为出发点,兼及其他作家的创作,分析比较不同国家的作家对历史探源的相似性与异质性,发掘其在不同文化背景下,如何对历史本质进行独特的思考,探究他们如何以个人经验、生命经历、玄想冥思,和对人类历史的缘起、演化抑或变异的历程进行理性追索,特别是在小说叙事中如何对历史起源、演变的“本质化”“固化”观念进行追问与质疑。进而通过对两位作家写作之间的比较与展现,凸显、引申出20世纪80年代以来中国当代作家怎样以在地性中国经验,对历史本质进行深度思索,从历史探源的别样途径,比较经典作家作品,映衬、发掘与阐发中国当代小说创作的深广度及其世界性意义。This essay aims to search for the similarities and differences on contemplating the essence of the human history from the works by Garcia Marquez, Yan Lianke and other writers, to explore how they reveal the nature of history in their unique ways and experiences under their own different cultures, and also tries to focus on how they understand the origins, changes and even mutations during the development of human society and history at the center of the fictions by these writers. Especially it researches about how they question and deconstruct the way of viewing the nature of the human history with fixed and essentialized minds. Through such kinds of comparisons between the two writers, this paper eventually emphasizes the achievements of Chinese contemporary writers, who since the 1980 s have fully shown Chinese characteristics of digging out the features of human history in their own experiences and unusual narrative skills. In other words, this is a special dimension and an insightful method to discover the real value of Chinese contemporary novels and the meaning of its internationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15