检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵馨冉 Zhao Xinran(School o£Humanities and Social Science,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)
出 处:《中南财经政法大学研究生论丛》2022年第4期118-126,共9页Journal of the Postgraduates of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:民事诉讼法规定的原告资格标准在反垄断私人诉讼领域无法保障市场主体的合法权益,实现维护市场竞争秩序的目的。参考国外反垄断私人诉讼原告由受损害到受影响的转型历程以及我国反垄断发展的实际需要,扩张原告资格范围具有可行性与必要性。具体制度层面,首先,明确基于受影响标准的资格判定框架淇次,厘清原告资格的合理边界;最后,通过完善团体诉讼以及损害量化程序等型塑私人诉讼的配套机制。The plaintiff qualification standard stipulated by the Civil Procedure Law cannot protect the legitimate rights and interests of market entities and achieve the purpose of maintaining the market competition order in the field of anti-monopoly private litigation.Considering the transformation process of the plaintiffe in foreign antitrust private lawsuits from being damaged to being affected and the actual needs of my country's antitrust development,it is feasible and necessary to expand the scope of plaintiff qualifications.At the specific institutional level,firstly,clarify the eligibility determination framework based on the impact criteria;secondly,clarify the reasonable boundaries of plaintiff qualifications;Finally,shape private litigation through the improvement of group litigation and damage quantification procedures and other supporting mechanisms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.152.135