内幕交易民事责任的性质及核心构成  

The Nature and Core Constitution of Civil Liability for Insider Trading

作　　者：史佳欣 SHI Jia-xin(School of Political Science and Law and Public Administration,Yan’an University,Yan’an 716000,Shaanxi)

机构地区：[1]延安大学政法与公共管理学院,陕西延安716000

出　　处：《延安大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期48-53,68,共7页Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：陕西省教育厅专项基金项目“金融监管视域下内幕交易主体范围及其类型化研究”(19JK0952);延安大学博士科研启动项目“证券市场内幕信息的认定路径及其类型研究”(YDBK2019-27)。

摘　　要：内幕交易的民事责任问题,一直以来都是学理上和实务中人们争论的焦点。一方面,内幕交易民事责任的相关立法在质疑中艰难推进;另一方面,内幕交易的民事责任在司法实践中也存在认定困难。概言之,内幕交易民事责任的宣示功能远大于其实际效用。由于内幕交易案件的独特属性,在我国现有实体法及程序法系统下,很难直接适用传统的民事责任规则。只有对内幕交易民事责任的性质、基本逻辑以及核心构成深入解析,才能创设适用于内幕交易特点的新型责任规则及相应诉讼结构。The civil liability of insider trading has always been the focus of debate in theory and practice.On the one hand,the legislation related to civil liability for insider trading is difficult to advance in doubt;On the other hand,the civil liability of insider trading also has difficulties in judicial practice.In a word,the declaration function of civil liability for insider trading is far greater than its actual effect.Due to the unique nature of insider trading cases,it is difficult to directly apply the traditional civil liability rules under the existing substantive law and procedural law system in China.Only by deeply analyzing the nature,basic logic and core constitution of the civil liability for insider trading,can we create new liability rules and corresponding litigation structures suitable for the characteristics of insider trading.

关 键 词：内幕交易 民事责任 公平交易权 诉讼结构 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]