检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩济全 邝成举 毕文泰 HAN Ji-quan;KUANG Cheng-ju;BI Wen-tai(School of Economics and Management,Henan Agricultural University,Zhengzhou 450046,China;Western China Economic Research Center,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 610074,China)
机构地区:[1]河南农业大学经济与管理学院,河南郑州450046 [2]西南财经大学中国西部经济研究中心,四川成都610074
出 处:《江西农业学报》2022年第6期237-242,共6页Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi
基 金:吉林省农业经济学会研究生专项(2021ZX02)。
摘 要:基于中国综合社会调查数据,利用有序Probit模型实证分析了公共服务供给水平对农村居民主观幸福感的影响。研究表明,公共服务单项供给水平与整体供给水平都能显著提高农村居民的主观幸福感。异质性分析发现,基本公共服务水平对农村老年人以及高收入人群带来的幸福效应更大。鉴于此,提出了政府应完善再分配政策,改善农村低收入群体的收入状况;政府应着眼于公共服务的充足性建设,加大公共服务建设的投资力度;进一步加强农村公共教育,提高农村社会保障水平等对策建议。Based on the data of comprehensive social survey in China, the influence of public service supply level on the subjective well-being of rural residents empirically was analyzed by the orderly Probit model. The research results show that both the single supply level of public services and the overall supply level can significantly improve the subjective well-being of rural residents. The heterogeneity analysis found that the level of basic public services brought greater happiness effects on the rural elderly and high-income people. The policy suggestions are as follows: improving the government redistribution policy,improving the income of rural low income groups, the government should focus on the adequacy construction of public services,increase the investment of public services and further strengthen rural public education and improve the level of rural social security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249