地方品质与区域创新:直接影响、溢出效应与空间差异  

Quality of Place and Regional Innovation:Direct Impact, Spillover Effects and Spatial Differences

作　　者：张超[1] 陈思 兰宗敏[2,3] ZHANG Chao;CHEN Si;LAN Zongmin(College of Economics and Management,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China;Department of Macroeconomic Research,Development Research Center of the State Council,Bejing 100010,China;Cllege of Government Management,Central University of Finance and Economics,Bejing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]河北工业大学经济管理学院,天津300401 [2]国务院发展研究中心宏观经济研究部,北京100010 [3]中央财经大学政府管理学院,北京100081

出　　处：《中国软科学》2022年第7期82-93,共12页China Soft Science

基　　金：国家自然科学青年基金项目“区域房价差异影响中国制造业产业转移的机制与对策研究”(71503067);国家自然科学青年基金项目“基于大数据的城市群空间演化特征与机制研究”(71804033);国家自然科学基金重点项目“我国产业集聚演进与新动能培育发展研究”(71733001);国家自然科学基金面上项目“人口迁移与都市圈发展协同机制及政策模拟研究”(72174219)。

摘　　要：当前我国地方品质驱动地区高质量发展的时代已经到来。基于2009—2016年中国284个地级及以上城市的空间面板数据,实证分析地方品质对区域创新能力的直接影响、溢出效应和空间差异。结果发现:地方品质的提升不仅显著促进本地区的创新发展,还对周边地区呈现显著的空间溢出效应,且地方品质对区域创新的驱动机制在空间上更倾向于通过人口流动尤其是人力资本游走传递。地方品质对区域创新的影响将伴随城市工资水平、发展阶段、人力资本规模和通达性等的提升而呈上升。从对本地和周边区域创新带动性看,地方品质中个人消费服务和地区健康环境的创新带动性更强,地区公共服务对本地和周边区域并未体现出显著的创新带动性。未来我国城市化发展应强化以地方品质推动城市转型的发展策略,在试点城市选择上应聚焦于高校聚集城市、交通枢纽城市以及大都市圈内部生态环境和城市服务条件较好的“边缘城市”。地方政府提升地方品质的策略应注重“点”与“面”结合,重视地方品质建设的空间联动性。At present, the era of high-quality development driven by quality of place in areas has come in China, based on the spatial panel data of 284 prefecture level and above cities in China from 2009 to 2016, this paper empirically analyzes the direct impact of quality of place on regional innovation capacity, spillover effects and spatial differences.The results show that the improvement of quality of place not only significantly promotes the innovation development of the region, but also has a significant spatial spillover effect on the surrounding areas, and the driving mechanism of quality of place on regional innovation is more likely to be transmitted through population flow, especially human capital migration.The impact of quality of place on regional innovation will increase with the improvement of urban wage level, development stage, human capital scale and accessibility.From the perspective of innovation driving force for local and surrounding areas, the innovation driving force of personal consumption service and regional health environment in quality of place is stronger, while the regional public service does not show significant innovation driving force for local and surrounding areas.In the future, China’s urbanization development should strengthen the development strategy of promoting urban transformation with quality of place, in the selection of pilot cities, we should focus on the “edge cities” with better ecological environment and urban service conditions, such as the gathering cities of colleges and universities, the transportation hub cities, and the Metropolitan area. The local government should pay attention to the combination of “point” and “face”, and the spatial linkage of quality of place construction.

关 键 词：地方品质 区域创新 空间溢出 空间效应差异 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]