我国涉外民事案件中自然人“经常居所地”界定的困境探析  

Dilemmas of Identifying Natural Person’s“Habitual Residence”in Foreign-related Civil Cases in China

作　　者：匡晶丹 KUANG Jing-dan(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2022年第8期42-45,共4页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：自然人“经常居所地”概念具有双重属性,其既是主体涉外认定标准的事实要素之一,又是我国重要的属人连接点,分别作用于民事诉讼程序和法律选择适用领域。该概念具有不确定性,因而其具体内涵需要在相关法律解释的指引下结合个案才能予以明确。但是由于这种界定方式的特殊性,在司法实践中,自然人“经常居所地”的认定面临着法律依据模糊和概念混淆困境。这种困境主要源于两个方面:立法上,部分法律出现了缺位现象或呈现僵硬化趋势;司法上,许多法院忽略了相似法律概念的差异性,任意混淆错用。The concept of natural person’s“habitual residence”has dual attributes.It is not only one of the standards in identifying whether subject involving foreign factors,but also an important personal connecting factor in China,which acts on the area of civil procedure and the application of law.Due to its uncertainty,the specific connotation of this concept needs to be clarified in combination with individual cases under the guidance of relevant legal interpretations.However,in judicial practice,the identification of natural persons’“habitual residence”faces the dilemma of vague legal basis and confusion of concepts.And such a dilemma mainly stems from two aspects.In legislation,some laws appear to be absent or gradually become rigid;in judicial,many courts ignore the differences of similar legal concepts and arbitrarily misuse them.

关 键 词：国际私法 经常居所地 涉外民事关系法律适用法 

分 类 号：D997.2[政治法律—国际法学]