刑法视域下的安乐死问题研究  

Research on euthanasia in Criminal Law perspective

作　　者：王植尧 Wang Zhiyao(Law School of Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学法学院,贵阳550025

出　　处：《中国卫生法制》2022年第5期67-70,共4页China Health Law

摘　　要：被害人承诺是对该病人能否实施安乐死的最重要要素,在具有有效被害人承诺的情况下,无论是积极安乐死还是消极安乐死的行为至少不应该具有违法性。积极安乐死与消极安乐死并无刑法上的区分意义,因此也不应该将其区别对待。安乐死的“社会决定”是一个难以明晰、确切的概念。所谓的“社会决定论”看起来是在保留被害人的社会性,但是在无形之中也给被害人以枷锁。现实中几乎不可能存在某人的继续存活可以为社会带来巨大利益的情况,以所谓的社会利益强行不让病人安乐死是极端功利主义的体现。The victim’s commitment is the most important element of whether the patient can carry out euthanasia. In the case of the victim’s commitment, whether active euthanasia or passive euthanasia behavior should not have illegality at least. Active euthanasia and passive euthanasia have no distinction in Criminal Law, so they should not be treated differently. The "social decision" of euthanasia is a concept that is difficult to define exactly and clearly. The so-called "social determinism" seems to preserve the victim’s sociality, but it also shackles the victim invisibly. It is virtually impossible that someone’s continued survival would bring great benefit to society. It is an extreme utilitarianism to prevent euthanasia for the so-called social benefit.

关 键 词：被害人承诺 安乐死 医事领域 社会决定 

分 类 号：D902[政治法律—法学理论]