执行时效规则的立法选择  

Legislative Choice of Executive Limitation Rule

作　　者：赵翠鸽 吴俊 ZHAO Cui-ge;WU Jun

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2022年第4期46-52,共7页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“松散结合型法院治理模式研究”(18CFX029)。

摘　　要：2007年民事诉讼法修订后,有关执行时效的规定发生了较大变化,其性质由申请执行期限变为申请执行时效,时间长度由6个月或1年统一延长为2年。然而,这次修订后有关权利人保护力度不够、义务人拖延履责、生效法律文书执行难等问题依然存在。在考察大陆法系国家和地区关于判决确认请求权执行时效规定的基础上,我国执行时效规则的修改面临两条路径:一是在期限长度方面,可对执行时效和诉讼时效作出一致规定;二是可适当延长执行时效期间。相比而言,后者更具有可操作性。After the revision of the Civil Procedure Law in 2007,the provisions on the limitation of execution have undergone major changes.The nature of the limitation of execution has been changed from the period of application for execution to the period of application for execution,and the length of time has been uniformly extended from six months or one year to two years.However,after this revision,there are still some problems such as insufficient protection of rights holders,delay of obligors in fulfilling their duties,and difficulty in implementing effective legal documents.Based on the investigation of the civil law system countries and areas about the prescription of execution of the right of request for judgment confirmation,there are two ways to change the rule of execution of prescription:One is that the prescription of prescription and the prescription of prescription can be made consistently;Second,the period of limitation can be extended appropriately.In contrast,the latter is more operational.

关 键 词：执行时效 诉讼时效 立法 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]