检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚敏[1] 尚思宁 常钰 CHU Min;SHANG Si-ning;CHANG Yu(Center for Industrial and Business Organization,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China)
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心,辽宁大连116025
出 处:《财经理论研究》2022年第4期26-36,共11页Journal of Finance and Economics Theory
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71603045);教育部人文社会科学规划项目(21YJA790011);辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目(L18AJY003);辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(L19CJY008);辽宁省教育厅项目(DUFE2017R04)。
摘 要:本文通过匹配省市宏观环境支出数据和个人微观幸福感调查数据(CGSS2013),对政府环境支出和中国居民主观幸福感之间的关系进行实证研究,力图寻找增进居民幸福感的助力。研究发现:随着政府环境支出水平的提升,居民个人幸福程度得到显著提高;政府环境支出对居民幸福感的影响存在异质性,政府环境支出对中等收入群体、城市居民和女性的影响更强。进一步研究发现,政府环境支出通过间接传导机制——客观收入、消费能力以及主观心情因素来影响居民幸福程度。稳健性检验也支持上述结论。By matching the environmental expenditure data of governments in provinces and cities at the macro level as well as personal happiness survey data at the micro level(CGSS2013),this paper empirically investigated the relationship between government’s environmental protection expenditure and subjective happiness of Chinese residents,trying to find ways to enhance residents’ happiness.The results were as follows.To begin with,as the government increased environmental protection expenditure,the personal happiness of residents was significantly improved.Besides,the impact of government’s environmental protection expenditure on residents’ happiness was heterogeneous,and such impact on middle-income groups,urban residents and females was stronger.Further research showed that such environmental expenditure affected residents’ happiness through indirect transmission mechanism:objective income,consumption ability and subjective mood factors.The robustness test also supported the above conclusion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.114