检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔爱华[1] 吕菁[1] Kong Aihua;LüJing(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,Qufu People’s Hospital,Jining,Shandong 273100)
出 处:《中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学)》2022年第4期139-140,共2页Chinese Medical Digest(Otorhinolaryngology)
摘 要:目的 分析上呼吸道感染患者实施个性化护理对其护理质量的影响。方法 采取抽签法将2020年5月 ~2021年5月我院上呼吸道感染患者76例分为对照组(38例,常规护理)、试验组(38例,个性化护理)。对比两组护理效果,肺功能改善情况,以此标准来评价整体护理质量。结果 试验组护理效果明显优于对照组,组间对比具有显著差异P<0.05;护理前2组肺功能对比无明显差异P>0.05,护理后试验组指标均高于对照组,组间对比统计学意义存在P<0.05。结论 对上呼吸道感染患者来说,实施个性化护理手段,对其护理质量的提升具有重要意义。Objective To analyze the effect of personalized nursing on the nursing quality of patients with upper respiratory tract infection.Methods From May 2020 to May 2021,76 patients with upper respiratory tract infection in our hospital were divided into control group (38 cases,conventional nursing) and experimental group (38 cases,personalized nursing) by drawing lots.The nursing effect and improvement of lung function were compared between the two groups,and the overall nursing quality was evaluated by this standard.Results The nursing effect of experimental group was significantly better than that of control group,and there was significant difference between groups (P<0.05);There was no significant difference in lung function between the two groups before nursing (P>0.05),and the indexes of experimental group were higher than those of control group after nursing (P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with upper respiratory tract infection,which is of great significance to the improvement of nursing quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117