国际法律斗争的攻防策略与法治破局:以国内法为视角  

Offensive and Defensive Strategies in International Lawfares and the Legal Resolutions: From the Perspective of Domestic Law

作　　者：赵骏[1] 顾天杰 ZHAO Jun;GU Tianjie(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2022年第7期1-14,共14页Pacific Journal

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“坚持统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治重大问题研究”(21JZD031)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“法律战”正在成为国家间竞争的重要方式,国内法愈加成为国际法律斗争的重要手段。从国际间法律攻守的实践来看,攻势一方的国内法包括单边制裁法等涉外特征明显的法律法规,也包括一般国内法所载的相关规则;守势的一方往往构建反制裁法律体系,并借助国际法和国际争端解决机制强化反制合法性和实效。近年来,我国被迫频频卷入“法律战”,这对综合运用国际法和国内法的法治协调、整合与实践能力提出了考验。我国应当重视国内法治和国际法治的互动效应,积极参与构建法律斗争支撑体系,全面推进外交法律斗争制度建设,在避免陷入单边主义的同时,有理、有利、有节地构筑应对国际法律攻击的坚固防线。“Lawfare” is becoming a key way of competition among different nations, and domestic law has increasingly become an important means of international lawfares. From the perspective of the lawfare practices, the domestic laws utilized by the offensive side include not only laws with obvious foreign-related features, such as unilateral sanctions acts, but also relevant rules contained in ordinary domestic laws. The defensive side often constructs a legal system against sanctions, and strengthens the legitimacy and effectiveness of countermeasures with the help of international law and international dispute settlement mechanisms.China’s frequent involvement in international lawfares in recent years challenges the competence and capacity to comprehensively implement international law and domestic law for coordination, integration and practice of rule of law. China should attach importance to the interactive effect of domestic and international rule of law, actively participate in the construction of a supporting legal system for lawfares, comprehensively promote a diplomatic and legal battle system, while avoiding falling into unilateralism, build a solid line of defense against legal offences in a rational, beneficial and disciplined manner.

关 键 词：法律战 涉外法治 国际法律斗争 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]