史志区别之我见——以《明史》《大明一统志》《三湾史略》为例  

Reflections on the differences between history and records-Taking History of Ming,Historical Geography of Great Ming,and Brief History of Sanwan as examples

作　　者：陈泽泓 Chen Zehong

机构地区：[1]广州市文史研究馆,广东广州510045

出　　处：《上海地方志》2022年第2期23-31,94,共10页Shanghai Chronicles

摘　　要：史志区别一直是方志界研讨热点而又未取得共识。此一问题不仅是方志学与历史学学科关系的重大问题,更是关乎地方志基础理论和编纂实践极为重要的问题。研究史志区别首先要明确定义史志概念,分析史志区别的具体对象为史志载体即史书与志书之区别,落脚于编史与纂志的区别。破解史志区别难题,可从史志是不同宗旨的两种体裁这一角度入手。横、竖写法及线、片写法之分,并非史志体例区别的绝对特征。本文以《明史》《大明一统志》对比及《三湾史略》之体裁为村史而非村志为例,阐述对史志区别问题的思考。The distinction between history and records has been a hot topic in the local chronicles circle,yet one disagrees with another and no consensus has been reached so far.This issue is not only a major issue of the disciplinary relationship between Local Chronicles Study and history,but also a very important issue related to the basic theory and compilation practice of local chronicles.The first thing to study the difference of history and records is to define their concepts,analyze their specific objects or carriers,namely the history books and books of records,and clarify historiography and the compilation of local chronicles.To crack the problem of obscure distinction between history and records,it is helpful to start from the perspective that they are two different systems and structures serving different purposes.The distinction between horizontal and vertical writing and line and segmented writing is not the absolute feature of the two.This paper takes the comparison between History of Ming,and Historical Geography of Great Ming and Brief History of Sanwan,which as a village history rather than the village annals,to illustrate the reflections on the distinction between history and records.

关 键 词：史志区别 体裁区别 宗旨区别 思考 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]