检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢秋玲 XIE Qiuling(Public Security Department of Fujian Police Academy,Fuzhou 350007,China)
机构地区:[1]福建警察学院,福建福州350007
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2022年第3期92-95,共4页Journal of Henan Police College
基 金:2018年福建省中青年教师教育科研资助项目“社区警务视角下的涉众经济犯罪防控——以福建省晋江市为例”(JAS170602)的阶段性成果之一。
摘 要:审计证据是国家审计人员在进行审计实务处理时的支撑与基础,就经济案件而言,单薄的审计证据不足以支撑并解释经济活动的全过程。通过研究发现,目前经济案件司法审定过程中的审计证据链存在诸多问题,如证据链不完整、审计证据受限、审计取证过程困难、方法单一等。应从严格规范审计证据提取流程、使用最佳审计证据执法、拓宽证据获取渠道等多个角度出发,不断完善审计证据链在经济案件中的司法运用。Audit evidence is the support and foundation for state auditors in conducting audit practice processing,and in the case of economic cases,a little audit evidence is not enough to support and explain the whole process of economic activities.Through the study,it is found that there are many problems in the current audit evidence chain in the process of judicial determination of economic cases,such as incomplete evidence chain,restricted audit evidence,difficult audit evidence extraction process,and single method.The judicial application of audit evidence chain in economic cases should be continuously improved from multiple perspectives,such as strictly regulating the audit evidence extraction process,using the best audit evidence for law enforcement,and broadening the channels of evidence acquisition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.141.114