侦讯中律师在场制度适用可行性之批判  

Critique of Applicability of Lawyer’s Presence System in Interrogations

作　　者：王道春[1] WANG Daochun(Hunan Police College,Changsha Hunan 410138,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南警察学院侦查系,湖南长沙410138

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2022年第3期96-102,共7页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要：当前,以“审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革正在大力推行,在此背景下,律师在场制度被众多学者与专家关注,成为一时之热议,大多数学者主张我国应有限度地引入该制度,极少数则认为该制度不宜在当下实施。事实上,律师在场制度的适用在我国虽有一定的必要性,然当下不具有可行性。除该制度本身缘由外,其国外应用现状及我国国情均决定了其在我国实施难度巨大。At present,reform of the "trial-centered" litigation system is being vigorously promoted.In this context,the lawyer’s presence system has been paid attention to by many scholars and experts and become a hot topic.Most scholars advocate the introduction of this system in China in a limited way,while a very few think that this system is not suitable for implementation at present.In fact,although there is a certain need for a lawyer’s presence system in China,it is not feasible at the moment.In addition to the system itself,the current situation of its application abroad and the national conditions of China have determined that it is extremely difficult to implement.

关 键 词：律师在场制度 侦查讯问 “侦查中心主义” 

分 类 号：D616[政治法律—政治学]