检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟祥瑞 MENG Xiangru
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法学院
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2022年第4期180-191,共12页Journal Of CUPL
摘 要:语言权利能否作为我国宪法规范中的一项公民基本权利,备受学界关注。当前语言权利研究缺乏对权利规范模式的整体把握,鲜见从规范分析视角出发,对语言权利的基本权利属性进行阐释说明。语言权利作为一项基本权利,天然具备“公民”与“民族”双重主体面向,其权利属性在不同语境下也展现出多重特征,在保障权利主体合法利益方面亦发挥着重要的宪制功能。语言权利在消极规范模式与积极规范模式共同作用下,呈现出新颖且复杂的规范结构。语言权利作为其他基本权利的“扬声器”,同人身自由、政治权利及受教育权等保持着紧密联系,却也区别于其他基本权利,独立存于宪法权利体系之中。Whether language rights can be regarded as a basic right of citizens stipulated by the Constitution of China has attracted much attention from the academic community.At present,the research on language rights lacks an overall grasp in terms of the normative model of rights,and it is rare to interpret the basic rights attributes of language rights from the perspective of normative analysis.As a basic right,language rights naturally have the dual subject orientation of“citizen”and“nation”,and such rights attributes also show multiple characteristics in different contexts.Also,the rights and also play an important constitutional role in protecting the legitimate interests and rights sofubjects.Language rights,in combination with negative normative models and positive normative models,present a novel and complex normative structure.As the“speaker”of other basic rights,the right to language is closely linked to personal liberty,political rights and the right to education,but it is different from other basic rights and exists independently in the constitutional rights system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.164.55