认罪认罚从宽案件上诉权的“去”与“留”——基于二审相关数据的分析  

The Appeal Right in Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment Cases——Based on the Data of Second Instance Proceeding

作　　者：陈玉忠[1] 胡子君[1] Chen Yuzhong;Hu Zijun

机构地区：[1]河北大学法学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2022年第8期115-124,共10页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目“认罪认罚从宽案件上诉权问题研究”(HB21FX002)。

摘　　要：探讨认罪认罚从宽案件中被告人上诉权的去留问题,不仅需要制度层面的价值分析和对法律文本的梳理与正确解读,更需要司法实践中有效数据的支持和深入的实证分析。取消认罪认罚从宽案件被告人的上诉权或对上诉权的行使进行限制,不仅会使认罪认罚程序中被追诉人的权利保障雪上加霜,而且也会损害认罪认罚从宽制度本身的公正性,进而危及确立认罪认罚从宽制度的正当性基础。相关实证数据表明,在认罪认罚从宽案件中保留上诉权并未明显造成诉讼效率的减损,同时保留上诉权还有助于通过落实量刑协商、精准量刑、繁简分流、保障机制的健全等促进认罪认罚从宽制度的进一步完善,以真正实现公正与效率的协调统一。The discussion of the appeal right in admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment cases requires not only the value analysis of the legal system and the correct interpretation of the legal text,but also the support of valid data and in-depth empirical analysis on judicial practice.The abolition or restriction of the appeal right in cases of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment will not only derogate the rights of the accused,but also damage the fairness of the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment,thus endangering the legitimate basis of the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment.Relevant empirical data also shows that the retaining of appeal right in cases of admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment does not reduce the litigation efficiency significantly,while the retaining of appeal right also helps to improve the negotiation on sentence,accurate sentencing,diversion of complicated and simplified cases and the safeguard mechanism,so as to promote the perfection of the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment,and truly achieve the unification of justice and efficiency.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 上诉权 上诉理由 诉讼效率 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]