论中国法学的国际话语权:缺失、原因和对策  

On the international discourse power of Chinese law:Lack,reasons and countermeasures

作　　者：姜敏[1] 郝煜洋 JIANG Min;HAO Yuyang(Foreign and Comparative Criminal Law Research Center,Southwest University of Political Science&Law,Chongqing 401120,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学外国与比较刑法研究中心,重庆401120

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期172-183,共12页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：西南政法大学科研创新项目“滥用个人信息的刑法规制研究”(2021XZXS-275)。

摘　　要：学术话语权是一种软实力,主要是指学术话语的影响力、判准力、引领力和应用力。当代哲学社会科学话语权的提高,已是中国的重大问题。作为哲学社会科学重要组成部分的法学,曾有过“中华法系”的辉煌时代。但随着清朝政府的衰落、西方法学话语的全球化运动、“西法东进”和中国晚清时期的各种要素的助力,导致中华法系话语体系解体。自此,中国法学话语即便没有在国际上销声匿迹,但也成了西方视域下的法学现代化的反面教材。尽管当代中国法学学术研究已呈硕果累累的繁盛景观,对域外法学的研究亦已成炙盛之势,但其在国际上依然处于失语或无语的境况。中国法学在国际上话语权的缺失之因包括:中国法学话语主体意识的缺失,导致中国法学学术研究主体缺乏自信和对中国古代和近代法的几乎全盘否定;中国学术研究的重复性生产和创新性不足,导致中国法学话语的学术质量不高;与域外法学的交流和对话沦为了单向度的学徒式的学习;西方法学话语的全球化运动仍在进行,其在国际上的话语权依然占据主导地位。但中国法学和法治建设已取得重大进步,需要中国学术话语反应这些进步和成绩,并在国际上传播其声音。因此,当代的中国法学必须提升学术话语权。法学学术话语的国际话语权的有无,与法学研究成果的数量及不断的重复性生产并无直接关系,通过对域外法学的“提线木偶”式的研究亦无法获得。法学话语权的提升应当针对前述原因寻找对策,做到“对症下药”。因此,中国法学学术研究必须首先重塑中国法学话语的主体性意识,从而祛除“他者异化”和“自我异化”的话语倾向;其次,在与域外法学进行交流的时候,应有对中国法学学术研究的自信,以改变学徒式的交流样貌;再次,更应以独立自主的研究姿态,进行创新性学术生�Academic discourse power is a kind of soft power, which mainly refers to the influence, judgment, guidance and application of academic discourse. The improvement of the discourse power of contemporary philosophy and social sciences has become a major issue in China. As an important part of philosophy and social sciences, Chinese law once had a glorious era of Chinese legal system. But with the decline of the Qing government, the globalization movement of western legal discourse, the “western law moving eastward” and other reasons of China’s late Qing Dynasty, the discourse system of Chinese legal system has disintegrated. Since then, even though Chinese legal discourse has not totally disappeared in the world, it has become a negative teaching material of legal modernization. Although the contemporary Chinese legal academic research has shown a fruitful and prosperous landscape, and the research on extraterritorial law has become a hot trend, it is still in the situation of speechlessness in the world. The reasons for the lack of discourse power of Chinese law in the world include: the lack of subject consciousness of Chinese legal discourse leads to the lack of self-confidence of Chinese legal academic research subjects and the almost total negation of Chinese ancient and modern laws;the repetitive production and lack of innovation of Chinese academic research lead to the low academic quality of Chinese legal discourse;the exchange and dialogue with foreign laws become one-way apprenticeship learning;the movement of globalization of western legal discourse is still going on, and its discourse power in the world is still dominant. However, significant progress has been made in the construction of Chinese law and the rule of law. It is necessary for Chinese academic discourse to reflect these progress and achievements and spread its voice internationally. The existence of the international discourse power of legal academic discourse is not directly related to the number and continuous repetitive production o

关 键 词：国际话语权 法律全球化 话语主体意识 学术质量 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]