检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘娟[1] 张森 卜斯源 LIU Juan;ZHANG Sen;BU Siyuan
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学人文与发展学院
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第4期5-31,共27页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“从脱贫攻坚到乡村振兴的有效衔接与转型研究”(20&ZD163)。
摘 要:乡村振兴战略一经提出就受到广泛关注,大量学术研究随之涌现。通过对乡村振兴战略实施以来农村社会研究领域关于此主题的代表性文献的梳理,本文发现,已有研究集中于乡村振兴的历史脉络与政策阐释、现实问题与主要挑战、城乡关系与要素关联、模式探索与行动研究、国际视野与本土实践等维度,并围绕农业转型、农村集体经济、农村土地制度、绿色农业发展、乡土文化风俗、乡村治理转型、人才振兴等焦点议题开展了广泛的学术讨论与争论。这些研究和讨论为理解乡村振兴战略提供了较为广泛的文献基础,但也存在大量反复证明阐释或流于问题表象的分析。以农村社会现实与实践为基础的深入调查仍较为稀缺,由此导致一些研究既未能准确把握乡村振兴实践中的关键现实问题,也未能有效回应国家发展过程中的农政转型等重大理论问题,乡村振兴研究、政策与行动实践存在一定程度的脱节。因此,本文认为,农村社会研究者应致力于丰富乡村振兴研究中的农民视角以增强对乡村现实的了解,通过强化研究的问题意识、优化问题取向来发现并阐释乡村振兴中的真问题,在此基础上充分发扬学术研究的实践品格,构建“研究—政策—行动”一体化的学术实践框架,从而推动乡村振兴研究通向更广阔的空间。As soon as the strategy of rural vitalization was put forward,it received widespread attention,with mountainous items of literature emerging in academia.Based on a survey of the selected literature on this topic in the field of rural social studies,this review finds that existing studies focus on several dimensions of rural vitalization,including the historical context and policy interpretation,practical problems and major challenges,rural-urban relations and correlations of elements,model exploration and action research,international perspectives and local practices,etc.;while at the same time,there are also extensive discussions and debates around some key issues such as agricultural transformation,rural collective economy,rural land regime,green agriculture,local culture and customs,rural governance transformation,and talent vitalization.These studies and discussions have provided a relatively broad literature basis for understanding the Rural Vitalization Strategy,but there are also plenty of repeatedly proved interpretations or superficial analyses,yet in-depth investigations based on rural social reality and practice are still rare.As a result,much of the literature fails to accurately comprehend the key problems in the field or to sufficiently engage with major theoretical issues such as the Agrarian Question in national development,while the research,policy,and actions around rural vitalization have somehow isolated from each other.This paper advocates that scholars should endeavor to enhance the comprehension of rural reality with enriched farmers’perspectives,identify and analyze the real concerns with strengthened problem awareness and optimized ways of questioning,and construct an integrated“research-policy-action”framework towards a broader space for rural vitalization studies based on praxis.
关 键 词:乡村振兴 农村社会研究 农民视角 “研究—政策—行动”一体化
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145