检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴志伟 樊文刚[1,2] 王谦 刘弋 马腾飞 WU Zhiwei;FAN Wengang;WANG Qian;LIU Yi;MA Tengfei(School of Mechanical,Electronic and Control Engineering,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing,100044;Key Laboratory of Vehicle Advanced Manufacturing,Measuring and Control Technology,Ministey of Education,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing,100044;China Railway Urumqi Group Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi,830011)
机构地区:[1]北京交通大学机械与电子控制工程学院,北京100044 [2]北京交通大学载运工具先进制造与测控技术教育部重点实验室,北京100044 [3]中国铁路乌鲁木齐局集团有限公司,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《中国机械工程》2022年第17期2125-2132,共8页China Mechanical Engineering
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2019JBM050)。
摘 要:基于自主研发的锂电驱动钢轨砂带打磨机和砂轮打磨机,以60N型钢轨廓形作为实验对象,全面对比了新型钢轨砂带打磨技术和传统砂轮打磨技术的性能。结果表明:当打磨压力在45~75 N范围内时,砂带打磨的材料去除率约为砂轮打磨的15~30倍,而当压力增大到90 N时,砂带打磨的材料去除率高达砂轮打磨的102倍;砂带打磨的振动加速度、噪声和能耗均小于砂轮打磨;砂带打磨切屑为带状,而砂轮打磨则表现为高温熔融状,同时当打磨压力增大到105 N时,砂轮打磨后钢轨表面会出现发蓝现象,而砂带打磨不会;此外,砂带打磨的横向表面粗糙度大于砂轮打磨,最高可达8μm,但满足中国铁路钢轨养护要求的最大值10μm。综上,钢轨砂带打磨技术在材料去除率、振动、噪声、能耗和温度等方面显著优于传统砂轮打磨技术,预期将成为工程实际中解决钢轨严重病害问题的有效方法之一。Based on the self-developed lithium battery-driven rail abrasive belt and abrasive wheel grinding machine,the 60 N rail profile was used as the experimental objects to comprehensively compare the performance of the new rail belt grinding technology and the traditional grinding wheel grinding technology.The results show that when the grinding pressure is in the range of 45 to 75 N,the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is about 15 to 30 times that of abrasive wheel grinding,while when the pressure is increased to 90 N,the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is as high as 102 times that of abrasive wheel grinding.The vibration acceleration,noise and energy consumption of abrasive belt grinding are less than that of abrasive wheel grinding.The abrasive belt grinding chips are banded,while the abrasive wheel grinding chips are molten at high temperature.At the same time,when the grinding pressure is increased to 105 N,the rail surface will turn blue after grinding,but the abrasive belt grinding will not.In addition,the lateral surface roughness of abrasive belt grinding is greater than that of abrasive wheel grinding,up to 8 μm,which meets the maximum 10 μm required by Chinese railway rail maintenance.To sum up,rail abrasive belt grinding technology is significantly superior to traditional abrasive wheel grinding technology in material removal rate,vibration,noise,energy consumption and temperature,etc.It is expected to be one of the effective methods to solve serious rail diseases in engineering practices.
分 类 号:TG580.6[金属学及工艺—金属切削加工及机床]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15