检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方淦[1] 倪浩[1] Fang Gan;Ni Hao
机构地区:[1]南京农业大学本科招生办公室,南京210095
出 处:《江苏高教》2022年第9期92-100,共9页Jiangsu Higher Education
基 金:江苏省第三届教育考试招生研究课题院级课题“美国‘百分比计划’对完善我国‘高校专项计划’招生的借鉴研究”(K-e/2021/20)。
摘 要:高等教育公平一直是政策研究关注的重点,研究者在梳理英美两国促进高等教育入学机会公平政策演进历程的基础上,运用吉尔伯特和特雷尔社会福利政策框架,围绕为谁提供政策、提供什么政策、如何提供政策以及如何筹集经费四个方面,对其进行分析和比较,总结出两国促进高等教育入学机会公平政策的特点。中国促进高等教育入学机会公平政策制定和实施可借鉴相关经验,细化弱势群体识别办法,精准定位政策惠及对象;调整公平政策内容供给,凸显改善地区教育导向;优化公平政策实施策略,构建促进公平长效机制;拓展工作经费筹措渠道,注重弱势群体全程关怀。Higher education equity has always been the focus of policy research. Based on the review of policy formulation and evolution, this study makes a comparative study on policies of promoting fair access to higher education in Britain and the United States of America. Through the Neil Gilbert and Paul Terrell welfare policy framework, the study summarizes the characteristics of two countries’ policies of promoting fair access to higher education from aspects of policy makers, policy content, policy methods and funds. The formulation and implementation of policies of promoting fair access to higher education in China can learn from relevant experience, refine the methods of identifying under-represented groups, and accurately locate the beneficiaries of the policies. We should also adjust the supply of fair access policies and highlight the orientation to improve regional education conditions;optimize the implementation strategy of fair access policies and build a long-term mechanism to promote equity;expand fund-raising channels and pay attention to the care for under-represented groups throughout the whole process.
关 键 词:社会福利政策分析框架 英美 高等教育入学机会公平 弱势群体
分 类 号:G649[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.117.210