机构地区:[1]佛山科学技术学院生命科学与工程学院,广东佛山528000 [2]广西扬翔股份有限公司,广西贵港537100 [3]辽宁省农业发展服务中心,沈阳110000
出 处:《黑龙江畜牧兽医》2022年第16期49-54,共6页Heilongjiang Animal Science And veterinary Medicine
基 金:2021年广东省乡村振兴战略专项“畜牧业转型升级技术支撑”;2021年广东省联合培养研究生示范基地项目。
摘 要:为了探究不同品种、胎次、断配间隔和输精次数对母猪繁殖性能的影响,试验以健康、体况相近的长白猪、大白猪、长白猪和大白猪的二元杂交猪为研究对象,采用单次输精和传统深部人工授精配种试验猪,记录每窝产仔总数、产活仔数、产健仔数和初生窝重繁殖信息,研究不同品种、胎次、断配间隔和输精次数对母猪繁殖性能的影响。结果表明:长白猪和二元杂交猪母猪的窝均产仔总数、窝均产活仔数、窝均产健仔数及平均初生窝重差异不显著(P>0.05),且均显著优于大白猪母猪(P<0.05)。不同胎次母猪繁殖性能差异较大,母猪在第1胎或第2胎时繁殖性能最佳,窝均产仔总数、窝均产活仔数、窝均产健仔数和平均初生窝重分别为13.01头、12.96头、12.28头和19.85 kg;第3胎和第4胎时繁殖性能趋于稳定,第5胎后明显下降;第6~8胎繁殖性能最差,窝均产仔总数、窝均产活仔数、窝均产健仔数和平均初生窝重分别为11.54头、11.45头、10.89头、17.46 kg,除窝均产健仔数与第5胎差异不显著外(P>0.05),其他指标均显著低于其他胎次(P<0.05)。断配间隔为1 d或2 d的母猪繁殖性能最佳,窝均产仔总数、窝均产健仔数、窝均产活仔数、平均初生窝重分别高达13.06头、13.03头、12.50头、19.40 kg;断配间隔为4 d的母猪繁殖性能最差,窝均产仔总数、窝均产健仔数、窝均产活仔数、平均初生窝重分别仅为11.95头、11.87头、11.28头、18.38 kg,其中窝均产仔总数、窝均产活仔数、窝均产健仔数均显著低于断配间隔为1 d或2 d、3 d的母猪(P<0.05),不同断配间隔母猪的平均初生窝重之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。单次输精的长白猪和二元杂交猪母猪的窝均产仔总数、窝均产健仔数、窝均产活仔数、平均初生窝重与传统深部人工授精差异不显著(P>0.05),但单次输精的大白猪母猪窝均产仔总数、窝均产活仔数、窝均产健仔数�In order to explore the effects of different breeds,parities,mating interval and number of inseminations on the reproductive performance of sows,healthy Landrace,Yorkshire,and binary hybrid pigs of Landrace and Yorkshire with similar body condition were selected for this experiment.Single insemination and traditional deep artificial insemination were used to mate trial pigs,and total litter size,number of live litters,number of healthy litters and newborn litter weight were recorded to study the effects of different breeds,parities,mating interval and number of inseminations on the reproductive performance of sows.The results showed that there were no significant difference in the total number of average farrowing per litter,number of average live farrowing per litter,number of average healthy farrowing per litter,and average primary litter weight between Landrace and binary hybrid sows(P>0.05),and they were significantly better than those of Yorkshire sows(P<0.05).The reproductive performance of sows with different parities was significantly different.The reproductive performance of sows during the 1 st to 2 nd parities,the total number of average farrowing per litter,the number of average live farrowing per litter,the number of average healthy farrowing per litter,and the average litter weight litter weight at birth were 13.01 pigs,12.96 pigs,12.28 pigs and 19.85 kg,respectively.The reproductive performance of the 3 rd and 4 th parity tended to be stable,but decreased significantly after the 5 th parity.The reproductive performance of the 6 th to 8 th parities was the worst.The total number of average farrowing per litter,the number of average live farrowing per litter,the number of average healthy farrowing per litter,and the average litter weight at birth were 11.54 pigs,11.45 pigs,10.89 pigs and 17.46 kg,respectively.Except that there was no significant difference between the number of healthy farrowing per litter and the 5 th parity(P>0.05),other indicators were significantly lower than those of other parit
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...