征收土地纠纷案件司法救济的困境反思与突破——基于S省法院司法实践的分析  

The Reflections and Resolutions on the Dilemma of the Judicial Remedy for Cases of Land Expropriation Disputes——Based on Analyses of Judicial Practice in Courts of S.Province

作　　者：王文斌 崔兆在 Wang Wenbin;Cui Zhaozai

机构地区：[1]山东法官培训学院 [2]山东省诸城市人民法院行政庭

出　　处：《中国不动产法研究》2022年第1期246-261,共16页Research on Real Estate Law of China

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“统一国土空间用途管制法律问题研究”(21BFX134)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：当前,我国涉征地纠纷案件仍呈现高发态势,受制于纠纷当事人日益增长的司法需求与司法资源的有限供给、行政权的惯性张力与司法权的张力不足及效力偏低、征地纠纷的复杂性与司法审查手段的有限性等结构性矛盾,运用司法手段解决征地纠纷还存在诸多困境。这意味着传统中立性、被动性司法已难以满足人民群众的司法期待,以合意、协作为特征的开放型司法模式证明更符合纠纷解决的需求。质言之,完善征地纠纷解决多元化平台,整合诉讼与非诉讼力量,强化司法审查,维持权利保障与权力制约之平衡,才能实质性化解征地纠纷。At present,the cases of land expropriation disputes in China are still showing a high incidence trend.Subject to structural contradictions between the increasing demand for justice from the related parties and the limited supply of the judicial resources,between the conventional arrogance and resistance of the executive power and the impotence and deficiency of the judicial power,between the complexity of land expropriations and the limitation of the judicial review methods etc.,there exist a lot of difficulties and dilemmas to resolve land expropriation disputes in a judicial way.This means that the current judiciary characterized by neutrality and passivity is hard to satisfy the public expectation of the justice,while the open judicial operation characteristic of consensus and cooperation is a more suitable solution of these disputes,which has been already proved by facts and practice.Frankly speaking,we have to improve the multiple dispute resolution mechanism related to land expropriations,promote the integration of litigation and non-litigation forces,intensify the judicial review and maintain the balance of right protection and power restriction so as to achieve the virtual solution of these disputes.

关 键 词：征地纠纷 司法救济 开放型司法模式 

分 类 号：D922.3[政治法律—法学]