检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史瑞祯 桑百川[1] SHI Rui-zhen;SANG Bai-chuan
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济研究院
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2022年第8期85-100,共16页International Economics and Trade Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA064)。
摘 要:为检验中国是否因“素”制宜进行对外投资,文章从要素环境竞争力视角切入,在理论分析的基础上,采用商务部《境外投资企业(机构)名录》等相关数据以及零膨胀负二项回归模型展开实证检验。结果表明,中国对“一带一路”沿线国家的对外直接投资(OFDI)更倾向于选择劳动力成本更低以及与中国的制度距离更小的区位,同时,也会选择资源禀赋、资本存量及技术水平表现更好的国家或地区。进一步讨论发现,中国OFDI区位选择存在区域异质性和国别差异性,而且加入其他要素发现,资本成本与创新距离均会显著影响中国的OFDI。此外,劳动资本等有形要素的成本优势与制度距离之间存在“增强”效应,与创新距离之间存在“削弱”效应。In order to test whether China chooses foreign investment projects based on the“factor”conditions,this paper uses the relevant data from“List of Overseas Investment Enterprises(Institutions)”issued by Ministry of Commerce and zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to carry out empirical tests from the perspective of factor environment competitiveness based on theoretical analysis.The results indicate that China’s outward foreign direct investment(OFDI)in the countries along the Belt and Road(B&R)is more inclined to choose the locations with lower labor costs and smaller institutional distance from China as well as the countries or regions with better resource endowment,capital stock and technological level.Further discussion reveals that there are regional heterogeneity and country differences in the location choice of China’s OFDI and it is found that both capital cost and innovation distance will affect China’s OFDI significantly after adding other factors.Moreover,there is an“enhancing”effect existing between the cost advantage of tangible factors(such as labor capital)and institutional distance,and a“weakening”effect existing between the cost advantage of tangible factors(such as labor capital)and innovation distance.
关 键 词:一带一路 对外直接投资 要素环境竞争力 区位选择 零膨胀负二项回归模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7