检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡晓鹏[1] 苏宁[1] Hu Xiaopeng;Su Ning
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院世界经济研究所,上海200020
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2022年第4期29-40,共12页Taiwan Research Journal
摘 要:从经济学理论角度看,国家之间的经济“脱钩”可分为经济同质型、突发中断型、发展抗争型和政治打压型四种形态。美国对华“脱钩”广泛体现于经贸、科技、国际政治、网络、社会等各个领域,具有明显的政治打压型特征,是经济“脱钩”政治化的典型表现。美国对华“脱钩”策略对中国经济和产业链地位、中美经济关系乃至全球治理体系都产生了一定影响,尤其对海峡两岸经贸关系造成负面冲击,但两岸在产业链以及区域经济长期互动中形成的紧密联系,则对两岸经贸“脱钩”起到了抑制作用。In economic theory, the decoupling of international economies can be divided into four types: economic homogeneity, sudden interruption, developmental resistance, and political suppression. The decoupling of the United States from China—in a wide variety of areas including trade, technology, international politics, the internet, and social communication—shows clear signs of political suppression.The process reflects the politicization of economic decoupling. The policy of the Sino-US economic decoupling has to various extent brought challenges to China’s economy and its role in the industrial chain, the Sino-US economic relations, and the global governance system. In addition, it has a negative impact on cross-Straits economic and trade relations. Nevertheless, the close cross-Straits ties, which have their deep roots in the industrial chains and the regional economic interaction, play a role in stalling the cross-Straits decoupling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166