检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈广鹏 CHEN Guang-peng(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出 处:《萍乡学院学报》2022年第2期41-47,共7页Journal of Pingxiang University
基 金:北京师范大学法学院2021年度学术型研究生专项科研基金课题(2021LAW010)。
摘 要:当前,我国医疗损害赔偿案件的数量呈现明显上升趋势,同时保护患者获得治疗机会利益的缺失问题也日益突出。文章通过比较研究法来分析中美两国在立法和裁判实践中,对机会丧失中的损害赔偿请求权与责任认定的差异。借鉴美国的先进经验,我国应当明确医疗侵权中机会丧失的损害赔偿请求权,并进一步细化对医疗机构的责任界定标准,使患者的权利得到更全面的保护。Currently,the number of medical damage compensation cases in China is on a significant rise,while the lack of protection of patients’ interest in access to treatment is becoming increasingly prominent.The paper analyzes the differences between the legislative and adjudication practices of China and the United States in terms of the right to claim damages and the determination of liability in loss of chance through a comparative study method.Drawing on the advanced experience of the United States,China should clarify the right to claim damages for loss of chance in medical tort and further refine the criteria for determining the liability of medical institutions,so that patients’ rights can be more comprehensively protected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200