检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈宗存[1] 符沙沙[3] 陈金逸 陈清华[1] 韩鹏定[2] 符茂雄 CHEN Zong-cun;FU Sha-sha;CHEN Jin-yi;CHEN Qing-hua;HAN Peng-ding;FU Mao-xiong(Department of Endocrinology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou HAINA 570311,China;Department of Pharmacy,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou HAINA 570311,China;Department of Respiratory,Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital,Haikou HAINA 570208,China)
机构地区:[1]海南医学院第二附属医院内分泌科,海南海口570311 [2]海南医学院第二附属医院药学部,海南海口570311 [3]中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院呼吸内科,海南海口570208
出 处:《中国新药与临床杂志》2022年第8期479-483,共5页Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
基 金:海南省卫生计生行业科研项目(21A200041);海南省自然科学基金(821MS138);海南省重点研发计划(ZDYF2021SHFZ080)。
摘 要:目的探讨自体富血小板凝胶(APG)联合噻吗洛尔局部外用治疗糖尿病足(DF)溃疡的疗效及安全性。方法选取DF患者120例,随机分为单药组和联合用药组,每组60例。所有患者均给予控制血糖、常规换药、抗感染等治疗,单药组在溃疡处外用APG治疗,联合用药组再加用0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液。治疗4周后,比较2组溃疡面积、溃疡面缩小速率、临床疗效和不良反应。并采用酶联免疫吸附法检测2组患者血浆网膜素1及血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平。结果2组治疗前DF溃疡面积、血浆网膜素1和VEGF水平比较无显著差异(均P>0.05)。治疗后,联合用药组溃疡面积小于单药组[(2.78±0.65)cm^(2) vs.(3.36±0.91)cm^(2)],溃疡面缩小速率[(0.18±0.06)cm^(2)·d^(-1) vs.(0.16±0.04)cm^(2)·d^(-1)]、临床总有效率(97%vs.85%)、网膜素1[(886.43±90.24)ng·L^(-1) vs.(847.28±87.67)ng·L^(-1)]和VEGF[(79.26±15.14)ng·L^(-1) vs.(73.58±13.27)ng·L^(-1)]水平高于单药组,差异有显著意义(均P<0.05)。2组治疗过程中无严重不良反应发生。结论APG联合噻吗洛尔局部外用治疗DF溃疡具有较好的临床疗效和安全性,可能与网膜素1、VEGF升高有关。AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich gel(APG)combined with timolol for topical treatment of diabetic foot(DF)ulcers.METHODS A total of 120 patients with DF were randomly divided into monotherapy group and combination group,with 60 cases in each group.All patients were treated with blood glucose control,routine dressing change,anti-infection and so on.The patients in the monotherapy group were treated with APG at the ulcers,and those in the combination group were treated with APG and 0.5%timolol eye drops.After 4 weeks of treatment,ulcer area,ulcer surface reduction rate,clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.The plasma levels of omentin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.RESULTS There were no significant differences in DF ulcer area,plasma omentin-1 and VEGF levels between 2 groups before treatment(all P>0.05).After treatment,ulcer area in the combination group was smaller than that in the monotherapy group((2.78±0.65)cm^(2) vs.(3.36±0.91)cm^(2)),while ulcer surface reduction rate((0.18±0.06)cm^(2)·d^(-1) vs.(0.16±0.04)cm^(2)·d^(-1)),total clinical response rate(97%vs.85%),omentin-1((886.43±90.24)ng·L^(-1) vs.(847.28±87.67)ng·L^(-1))and VEGF((79.26±15.14)ng·L^(-1) vs.(73.58±13.27)ng·L^(-1))were significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group(all P<0.05).No serious adverse reactions occurred in both groups.CONCLUSION APG combined with timolol for topical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers has good clinical efficacy and safety,which may be related to the increase of omentin-1 and VEGF.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.204.106