鲍威尔与费尔巴哈:马克思思想形成的双重中介--兼评兹维·罗森的《布鲁诺·鲍威尔和卡尔·马克思》  

Bauer and Feuerbach:Dual Mediators in the Formation of Marx’s Thought--Also on Zvi Rosen’s Bruno Powell and Karl Marx

作　　者：王伟[1] WANG Wei(Institute of Philosophy,Hebei Academy of Social Sciences,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050051,China)

机构地区：[1]河北省社会科学院哲学研究所,河北石家庄050051

出　　处：《河北开放大学学报》2022年第4期94-98,共5页Journal of Hebei Open University

基　　金：2021年度河北省社会科学基金项目《马克思自然观及其当代价值研究》(HB 21 zx 004)。

摘　　要：在费尔巴哈的思想被公认为马克思思想的来源时,波兰学者兹维·罗森试图对马克思思想的形成作出新解释。为此,他突出了鲍威尔的思想对马克思的全面影响,从而为探讨其他人的思想对马克思的影响提供了可能性。但他在这样做的同时,却试图消解甚至否定费尔巴哈在马克思思想形成中的作用,好像费尔巴哈和鲍威尔在马克思的思想形成中是不能并存的。实际上,上至古希腊哲学家,下至马克思的同时代人,马克思在兼收并蓄、博采众长的基础上形成了自己的新世界观。费尔巴哈和鲍威尔都曾影响过马克思,都以自己不同的方式促进了马克思思想的形成。When Feuerbach is recognized as the source of Marx’s thought,Zvi Rosen tries to give a new explanation of the formation of Marx’s thought.By highlighting Bauer’s overall influence on Marx,he offers the possibility of exploring the influence of other people on Marx.At the same time,he tries to dissolve or even deny Feuerbach’s role in the formation of Marx’s thought,as if Feuerbach and Bauer could not be juxtaposed in the formation of Marx’s thought.In fact,from ancient Greece down to Marx’s contemporaries,Marx formed his new worldview on the basis of others.Even if there were individual figures or ideas that had a greater influence on Marx,the role of other intellectual resources in Marx’s thinking cannot be denied.Thus,both Feuerbach and Bauer influenced Marx,and both contributed to the formation of Marx’s thought by their own different ways.

关 键 词：鲍威尔 费尔巴哈 马克思 中介 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]